Skip to main content
Seminar Presentation 
on 
SCOPE OF SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS IN INDIA 
Under the Guidance of: Presented By: 
Dr. R. P. Saini Raj Kumar Bairwa 
Head of the department M-Tech (AHES) 
IIT Roorkee Enroll No.: 13512026 
ALTERNATE HYDRO ENERGY CENTRE 
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ROORKEE 
1
OUTLINES 
1. Introduction 
2. Energy scenario 
3. Potential for solar energy in india 
4. Solar thermal energy 
5. Solar thermal power plants 
6. Components of a CSP power plant 
7. CSP technologies 
8. Literature review 
9. Conclusion 
10. Gaps identified 
11. References 
2
INTRODUCTION 
 For economic development Energy is 
the basic requirement. 
 Coal , Nuclear , Natural gases and 
Petroleum are used to exploit as main 
source of high quality energy products. 
 India is 3rd largest producer of 
electricity after US and China, even 
though suffers a major shortage of 
electricity generation capacity. 
 Installed capacity of electricity is 
249.49 GW as of end June 2014. 
 Energy sources will play an important 
role in the world’s future given that the 
global demand for energy is rapidly 
increasing. 
Renewable 
power 
plants 
12% 
3 
Sources of energy 
Non 
Renewable 
plants 
88% 
constitute
ENERGY SCENARIO 
POWER SUPPLY POSITION IN INDIA IN 2014-15 
4 
REGION 
ENERGY PEAK POWER 
REQUIREMENT 
(MU) 
AVAILABILITY 
(MU) 
SURPLUS(+) / 
DEFICIT (-) 
DEMAND 
(MW) 
SUPPLY 
(MW) 
SURPLUS(+) / 
DEFICIT (-) 
Northern 3,28,944 3,18,837 -3.10% 47,570 46,899 -1.40% 
Southern 2,98,180 2,60,366 -12.70% 41,677 32,423 -22.20% 
Eastern 1,18,663 1,14,677 -3.40% 17,608 17,782 1.00% 
North Eastern 14,823 12,248 -17.40% 2,543 2,215 -12.90% 
Western 2,88,062 2,89,029 0.30% 45,980 52,652 14.50% 
ALL INDIA 10,48,672 9,95,157 -5.10% 1,47,815 1,44,788 -2.00%
RENEWABLE ENERGY 
5 
ENERGY SCENARIO 
TYPE TECHNOLOGY INSTALLED CAPACITY (MW) 
OFF GRID / CAPTIVE 
POWER 
Bagasse Cogeneration 517.34 
SPV Systems (>1KW) 159.77 
Biomass Gasifiers - Industrial 146.40 
Waste to Power 119.63 
Biomass Gasifiers - Rural 17.63 
Water Mills / Micro Hydro 10.18 
Aero generator/ Hybrid Systems 2.18 
TOTAL OFF GRID/ CAPTIVE POWER 973.13 
GRID CONNECTED 
POWER 
Wind 20,298.83 
Small Hydro Power Projects 3,774.15 
Bagasse Cogeneration 2,512.88 
Solar 2,208.36 
Biomass Power and Gasification 1,285.60 
Waste to Power 99.08 
TOTAL GRID CONNECTED POWER 30,177.90 
TOTAL 31,151.03
SOLAR POWER POTENTIAL 
6 
 Globally:
POTENTIAL OF SOLAR ENERGY IN 
INDIA 
 About 5000 trillion kWh/year energy is 
incident over India’s land area. 
 Most parts receiving 4 – 7 kWh/m2/day. 
 1% of land area is sufficient to meet electricity 
needs of India till 2031. 
 Highest annual global radiation is received in 
Rajasthan (5.5 – 6.8 kWh/m2/day) and 
Northern Gujarat. 
 Most of India has solar insolation above 
1800 kWh/ m2/ day. 
 250–300 clear and sunny days in a year. 
7
SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY (STE) 
8 
 Principle: Sunlight – Heat – Electricity 
Sunlight is concentrated, using mirrors or 
directly, on to receivers heating the 
circulating fluid which further generates 
steam &/or electricity. 
 Solar Radiation Components: 
Direct, Diffuse & Global 
 CSP uses- Direct Normal Irradiance (DNI)
SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS 
(STPP) 
 Solar energy can be tapped to produce 
electricity by using solar concentrators. 
9 
 It is also called Concentrated solar 
power (CSP). 
 India can have a STE installed base of 
4–5 GW by 2020. 
 Solar thermal technology for electricity 
generation is one of the best solution to 
the growing fossil fuel crisis. 
 Concentrating solar power (CSP) is not 
an innovation of the last few years. 
Records of its use date as far back as 
212 BC when Archimedes used mirrors 
for the first time to concentrate the 
Sun’s rays.
WORKING OF SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANT 
10
COMPONENTS OF STPP 
11
COMPONENTS OF STPP….. 
12
13 
Concentrating Solar 
Technologies 
Low Temperature 
(<100°C) 
Flat Plate Collectors 
Solar Chimney 
Solar Pond 
High Temperature- 
Point Focusing (>400°C) 
Central Tower 
Parabolic Dish 
Medium Temperature – Line 
Focusing (≈ 400°C) 
Parabolic Trough 
Fresnel Collectors
Commercial CSP 
Parabolic 
Trough 
Central Tower Dish Stirling Fresnel 
Collector 
• Temp~400°C 
• Line Focusing 
• Linear Receiver tube 
• Water consuming 
• Conc.: Parabolic Mirrors 
• Heat Storage feasible 
• Most Commercialized 
• Good for Hybrid option 
• Requires flat land 
• Good receiver η but low turbine η 
14
Commercial CSP 
Parabolic 
Trough 
Central Tower Dish Stirling Fresnel 
Collector 
• Temp~600-800°C 
• Point Focusing 
• Flat Conc. Mirrors 
• Commercially proven 
• Central Receiver 
• Water consuming 
• Heat Storage capability 
• Feasible on Non Flat sites 
• Good performance for large 
capacity & temperatures 
• Low receiver η but good turbine η 
15
Commercial CSP 
Parabolic 
Trough 
Central Tower Dish Stirling Fresnel 
Collector 
16 
• Temp~700-800°C 
• Point Focusing 
• Uses Dish concentrator 
• Stirling Engine 
• Generally 25 kW units 
• High Efficiency ~ 30% 
• Dry cooling 
• No water requirement 
• Heat storage difficult 
• Commercially under development 
• Dual Axis Tracking 
16
Commercial CSP 
Parabolic 
Trough 
Central Tower Dish Stirling Fresnel 
Collector 
• Temp~400°C 
• Line Focusing type 
• Linear receiver 
• Fixed absorber row 
shared among mirrors 
• Flat or curved conc. 
mirrors 
• Commercially under 
development 
17 
• Less Structures 
• 5 MW operational in CA
LIST OF SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS IN INDIA 
18 
Sr. 
no. 
Project name Location 
Turbine 
Description 
Technology 
Heat-Transfer fluid 
Type 
Turbine 
Capacity 
(MW) 
Thermal 
Storage 
Status, Start year Owner(s) 
1. 
Abhijeet Solar 
Project 
Rajasthan, 
(Jaisalmer) 
SST-700 Parabolic trough Therminol VP-1 
Net: 50.0 
Gross: 50.0 
None 
Under construction, 
2013 
Corporate Ispat 
Alloys Ltd. 
(100%) 
2. 
AC ME Solar 
Tower 
Bikaner 
(Rajasthan) 
- Power tower Water/Steam 
Net: 2.5 
Gross: 2.5 
None Operational, 2011 
AC ME Group 
(100%) 
3. Dhursar 
Dhursar 
(Rajasthan) 
- 
Linear Fresnel 
reflector 
- 
Net: 125.0 
Gross: 125.0 
None 
Under construction, 
2014 
Reliance Power 
(100%) 
4. Diwakar 
Askandra 
(Rajasthan) 
SST-700 Parabolic trough Synthetic Oil 
Net: 100.0 
Gross: 100.0 
4 hours 
Under construction, 
2013 
Lanco Infratech 
(100%) 
5. 
Godawari Solar 
Project 
Nokh 
(Rajhastan) 
SST-700 Parabolic trough Dowtherm A 
Net: 50.0 
Gross: 50.0 
None Operational, 2013 
Godawari 
Green 
Energy Limited 
(100%) 
6. 
Gujarat Solar 
One 
Kutch 
(Gujarat) 
- Parabolic trough Diphyl 
Net: 25.0 
Gross: 28.0 
9 hours 
Under construction, 
2014 
Cargo Solar 
Power (100%) 
7. 
KVK Energy 
Solar Project 
Askandra 
(Rajasthan) 
SST-700 Parabolic trough Synthetic Oil 
Net: 100.0 
Gross: 100.0 
4 hours 
Under construction, 
2013 
KVK Energy 
Ventures Ltd 
(100%) 
8. 
Megha Solar 
Plant 
Anantapur 
(Andhra 
Pradesh) 
- Parabolic trough Synthetic Oil 
Net: 50.0 
Gross: 50.0 
None 
Under construction, 
2013 
Megha 
Engineering 
and 
Infrastructue 
(100%) 
9. 
National Solar 
Thermal Power 
Facility 
Gurgaon - Parabolic trough Therminol VP-1 
Net: 1.0 
Gross: 1.0 
None Operational, 2012 
IIT Bombay 
(100%) 
10. 
‘India One’ 
solar thermal 
power plant 
Abu Road 
(Rajasthan) 
- 
Paraboliedal 
reflector 
Water 1.0 16 hours 
Under construction, 
2011 
WRST
19 
ADVANTAGES OVER COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES 
(EG. PV & WIND) 
 Heat Storage option – Electricity Supply after Sunset 
 Process Heat Generation 
 Hybrid Option 
 Good for High temperature regions 
 Predictable and reliable power (less variable) 
 Water desalination along with electricity generation 
OTHER BENEFITS : 
 Carbon Emission Reduction- CDM benefits Each square meter of CSP can avoid annual emissions of 200 to 
300 kilograms (kg) of carbon dioxide, depending on its configuration. 
 No Fuel or its transportation cost - Substitutes Fossil Fuel use 
 Energy Security 
 High share of local contents 
 Employment Generation
Feasible Applications 
Utility / Commercial scale Domestic/small Scale 
 Electricity Generation 
 Stand alone 
 Grid projects 
 Hybrid projects 
 Industrial Process Heat 
 Boiling 
 Melting 
 Sterilizing 
 Cooling systems 
 Water Desalination 
 Hot Water collectors 
 Solar HVAC 
 Solar steam Cooking 
 Solar Ovens/cookers 
 Solar Food dryers 
SOPOGY 
Micro-CSP: SopoFlare 
20
LITERATURE REVIEW 
21 
S.No. AUTHOR(S) SYSTEM / PARAMETER(S) RESULTS 
1 
Naveen Kumar 
Sharma et al. [1] 
Summarize the availability, current status, 
strategies, perspectives, promotion policies, major 
achievements and future potential of solar energy 
options in India. 
1. Major government and industry R&D efforts 
aim to make solar thermal electricity (STE) 
and central photovoltaic (CPV) a mainstream 
power source within the next decade. 
2 Atul Sharma [7] 
Discuss the various technologies, government 
policies, incentives etc. for harnessing the solar 
power in India and world. And Examines various 
ways in which solar power is precisely such an 
opportunity. 
1. The economically exploitable potential of the 
solar power technology of India is quite high. 
2. The development of solar thermal technology 
is imperative in India. 
3. 
Ishan Purohit et 
al. [8] 
Assess the potential, financial viability of CSP 
generation in the Northwestern (NW) regions of 
India. Using Solar Advisor Model developed by 
NREL, USA for four commercially available and 
mature CSP technologies. 
1. It is possible to exploit over 2000 GW CSP 
potential in the NW India.
Literature Review Continued … 
22 
S.No. AUTHOR(S) SYSTEM / PARAMETER(S) RESULTS 
4. 
J.D. Nixon et al. 
[9] 
Study the main existing collection technologies 
and compared based on economical, technical 
and environmental criteria. This methodology is 
applied principally to a case study in Gujarat in 
north-west India. 
1. Linear Fresnel lens with a secondary 
compound parabolic collector, or the parabolic 
dish reflector, is the preferred technology for 
north-west India. 
5. 
V. Siva Reddy et 
al. [10] 
Case studies of typical 50 MW solar thermal 
power plants in the Indian climatic conditions at 
locations such as Jodhpur and Delhi is 
highlighted with the help of techno-economic 
model. Considering 30 years lifespan and 10% 
interest rate on investment. 
1. parabolic dish concentrating solar Stirling 
engine power plant generate electricity at a 
lower unit cost than the other two solar 
technologies 
6. 
A.S. Pidaparthi 
et al. [11] 
A test facility which would help in gaining 
experience in design, operation and maintenance 
of large scale solar thermal power plants by IIT 
BOMBAY. This facility would also help in 
facilitating research development in the solar 
industry in India. 
1. The solar field consists of three loops with 
parabolic troughs of a total of about 1,500 
meters in length and covering an area of 8,000 
square meters. 
2. The solar field configuration of three loops of 
four collectors includes 12 steel structures of 
10 modules, 3,360.
Literature Review Continued … 
23 
S.No. AUTHOR(S) SYSTEM / PARAMETER(S) RESULTS 
7. 
Richa Mahtta et 
al. [12] 
They determine district-wise potential for 
concentrating solar power (CSP) and centralized 
solar photovoltaic (SPV) technology based power 
plants in India. The evaluation is based on remotely 
sensed annual average global horizontal irradiance 
(GHI) and direct normal irradiance (DNI) provided 
by National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
(NASA) surface meteorology and solar energy 
program. 
1. There is more scope for SPV as 
compared to CSP in India. 
2. Jaisalmer, Bikaner and Jodhpur districts 
of Rajasthan, Kachchh district of Gujarat 
show very high solar potential. 
8. 
Pranesh 
Krishnamurthy 
et al. [13] 
A framework for calculating the cost of generated 
electricity from a concentrated solar power (CSP) 
plant and the internal rate of return on equity and 
different factors like Plant size, solar insolation and 
discount rate also consider and effect of variation of 
these are disused. 
1. Important parameters related to cost of 
solar thermal power include location, 
availability of capital, thermal storage 
and plant size. 
2. A 20% drop in solar field and power 
block costs combined with a 10% 
increase in collector efficiency and an 
increase by 5% in overall plant 
efficiency results in a generation cost of 
Rs.7 ($ 0.15)/kWh.
Literature Review Continued … 
24 
S.No. AUTHOR(S) SYSTEM / PARAMETER(S) RESULTS 
9. 
K.S. Reddy et al. 
[14] 
A techno-economic feasibility analysis 
of a 5MWe solar parabolic dish 
collector field is carried out for entire 
India covering 58 locations. 
1. The minimum and maximum average annual power 
generation at Panaji and Tiruchirappalli are 7.25 GWh and 
12.68 GWh respectively. 
2. The minimum levelised electricity cost (LEC) for a stand-alone 
solar parabolic dish power plant with the clean 
development mechanism (CDM) is found to be at Indore 
with payback period of 10.63 years with cost benefit ratio 
of 1.48. 
10. 
T.V. 
Ramachandra et 
al. [15] 
They identify the solar hotspots based 
on the exploitable potential using high 
resolution global insolation data from 
NASA SSE in India across federal 
boundaries and agro-climatic zones. 
1. Nearly 58% of the country receives annual average Global 
insolation of 5 kWh/m2/day. 
2. It creates an employment opportunities especially in the 
village level. 
11. 
Md. Fahim 
Ansari et al. [16] 
They try to develop a structural model 
of the barriers to implement solar 
power installations in India. Thirteen 
relevant barriers to implement solar 
power installations have been identified 
and interpretive structural modeling 
(ISM) methodology has been used. 
1. High Pay-back period is coming at top of the model. 
2. Lack of trained people and training institutes has been 
identified as linkage barrier which is an unstable barrier. 
3. Need for backup or storage device, unavailability of solar 
radiation data and lack of R&D work have been identified.
Literature Review Continued … 
25 
S.No. AUTHOR(S) SYSTEM / PARAMETER(S) RESULTS 
12. 
Ishan Purohit et 
al. [17] 
They done a technical and economical 
assessment of CSP technologies in India and to 
analyze the techno-economic feasibility in Indian 
conditions two projects namely PS-10 (Power 
technology) and ANDASOL-1 (parabolic trough 
technology) have been taken as reference. These 
two systems have been simulated at several 
Indian locations. 
1. Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol the use of 
CSP systems is financially feasible in most of 
the locations considered in three states viz. 
Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh. 
2. The unit cost of electricity generated by these 
two systems at Rajasthan and Gujarat states is 
lower. 
3. CDM benefits improve the values of financial 
performance indicators of CSP systems. 
13. 
M.S. Soni et al. 
[18] 
They identified the Parameters required for the 
commissioning of solar power plants in India 
using solar PV and CSP technologies. And Forty 
one parameters are considered for the study. 
1. For both PV and CSP technologies, direct 
investment cost was highly preferred 
economical attribute, while the insurance cost 
is least preferred. 
2. Among technical parameters, location of the 
site is given top priority and Fire alarm system 
is given least favored. 
3. In CSP, the type of CSP technology used is 
given top preference with slight variation in 
perception for other parameters. The module 
mounting structure is given last preference.
CONCLUSION 
26 
A large amount of Indian STE output is consumed in Delhi, Haryana, and Punjab, 
drawing upon supply sites in both Rajasthan and Jammu and Kashmir. Population 
centers in Gujarat are also well positioned to extract power from Rajasthan. 
As of early 2010, the global stock of CSP plants neared 1 GW capacity. A 
number of projects being developed in countries including USA, Spain, 
India, Egypt, Morocco, and Mexico are expected to total 15 GW. 
All solar thermal power plants in India not used thermal storage 
technologies very efficiently. 
The launch of The JNNSM by MNRE, Government of India is the first step 
in the promotion and establishment of solar energy as a viable alternative 
to conventional sources. 
The establishment of feed-in tariffs and other incentives, passing dynamic 
government policies, and the cooperation of industry, researchers and 
other stakeholders will play crucial role in the development of CSP 
technology 
solar thermal power generation is totally a new technology in India, thus 
much more efforts are required for the upliftment of the energy scenario on 
large scale.
GAPS IDENTIFIED 
Though all three basic types of storage media (sensible, latent, thermochemical) 
have the potential to make solar power plants viable, more research is still needed 
to improve the thermal performance and economics of these systems. 
Other CSP technologies like Heliostat, parabolic dish system and solar 
chimney are not used up till now in India. 
Due to shortage of water in Rajasthan Parabolic dish / Engine system is a 
suitable option. 
27 
Dust problem is frequently occur in CSP plants so it requires more R&D.
REFERENCES 
[1] Sharma N.K, Tiwari P.K, Sood Y.R. Solar energy in India: Strategies, policies, perspectives and future potential. 
28 
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (2012) 933– 941. 
[2] Singh R, Sood YR. Transmission tariff for restructured Indian power sector with special consideration to promotion 
of renewable energy sources. IEEE TENCON Conf. 2009:1–7. 
[3] Sood Y.R, Padhy N.P, Gupta H.O. Wheeling of power under deregulated environment of power system-a 
bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans Power System 2002; 17(3):870–880. 
[4] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy source (MNRE), http://www.mnre.gov.in/achievements.htm; 2014 [accessed 
August 2014]. 
[5] Purohit I, Purohit P. Techno-economic evaluation of concentrating solar power generation in India. Energy Policy 
2010; 38:3015–29. 
[6] JNNSM. Mission document, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Government of India. Jawaharlal Nehru 
National Solar Mission; 2009, <http://mnre.gov.in/pdf/mission-document-JNNSM.pdf> [accessed 29.7.2014]. 
[7] Sharma A. A comprehensive study of solar power in India and World. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 
(2011) 1767–1776. 
[8] Purohit I., Purohit P., Shekhar S., Evaluating the potential of concentrating solar power generation in Northwestern 
India. Energy Policy 62(2013)157–175.
REFERENCES CONTINUED… 
[9] Nixon J.D., Dey P.K., Davies P.A., Which is the best solar thermal collection technology for electricity generation in 
29 
north-west India? Evaluation of options using the analytical hierarchy process. Energy 35 (2010) 5230-5240. 
[10] Reddy V.S., Kaushik S.C., Ranjan K.R., Tyagi S.K., State-of-art of solar thermal power plants-A review, Renewable 
and sustainable Energy reviews 27 (2013) 258-273. 
[11] Pidaparthi A.S., Prasad N.R., India’s first solar thermal parabolic trough pilot power plant. SolarPACES 2013, Energy 
Procedia 49 (2014) 1840 – 1847. 
[12] Mahtta R., Joshi P.K., Jindal A.K., Solar power potential mapping in India using remote sensing inputs and 
environmental parameters. Renewable Energy 71 (2014) 255-262. 
[13] Krishnamurthy P., Mishra S., Banerjee R., An analysis of cost of parabolic trough technology in India. Energy Policy 
48 (2012) 407–419. 
[14] Reddy K.S., Veershetty G., Viability analysis of solar parabolic dish stand-alone power plant for Indian conditions. 
Applied Energy 102 (2013) 908–922. 
[15] Ramachandra T.V., Jain R., Krishnadas G., Hotspots of solar potential in india, Renewable and Sustainable Energy 
Reviews 15 (2011) 3178– 3186. 
[16] Ansari M.F., Kharb R.K., Luthra S., Shimmi S.L., Chatterji S., Analysis of barriers to implement solar power 
installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27 
(2013) 163–174.
REFERENCES CONTINUED… 
[17] Purohit I., Purohit P., Techno-economic evaluation of concentrating solar power generation in India. Energy Policy 38 
30 
(2010) 3015–3029 
[18] Soni M.S., Gakkhar N., Techno-economic parametric assessment of solar power in India: A survey. Renewable and 
Sustainable Energy Reviews 40 (2014) 326–334. 
[19] IEA. Technology roadmap concentrating solar power; 2010. /<http://www. iea.org/papers/2010/csp_roadmap.pdf >. 
[20] Behar O., Khellaf A., Mohammedi K., A review of studies on central receiver solar thermal power plants. Renewable 
and Sustainable Energy Reviews 23 (2013) 12–39. 
[21] Deodhar PS. Dust can reduce energy output. In: Electronics for you; 2010. p. 42 www.efymagonline.com/pdf/Solar- 
Tips Dusting.pdf. 
[22] Bhattacharyya CS. An overview of problems and prospects for the Indian power sector. Energy 1999; 19:795–803. 
[23] http://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/projects_by_status.cfm?status=Operational 
[24] http://www.india-one.net/abouttheproject.html 
[25] http://energybusinessdaily.com/power/dust-removing-technology-couldincrease- solar-panel-efficiency/.
Earth receives around 174 Petawatts of energy from sun 
and only a small part of it is sufficient to meet the annual 
world electricity consumption of 20 Trillion kWh 
31 
We Just need to tap this 
potential 
Thank You