Skip to main content
1
Instructional Teams: Working Toward High Quality Implementation
Self-assessment Rubric
School improvement is premised on the firm belief that it is best accomplished when directed by the people closest to the students,
including classroom teachers, specialists, and school administrators. When working collaboratively in Instructional Teams, rather than
in isolation, they positively impact student achievement (Hattie, 2009). Research-based indicators of effective practice help guide
instructional teams to do their work. This process begins by establishing structures and organization for effective meetings. Once
these have been established, the teams turn to the work of developing standards-aligned units of instruction, among other tasks.
The term Unit of Instruction is meant to include the following components:
 References to appropriate grade-level and subject standards and benchmarks
 Concepts, principles, and skills covered within the unit
 Objectives aligned to standards and benchmarks
 Pre-/Post-assessments used to determine mastery
 Criteria for mastery
The purpose for this rubric is to provide instructional teams a tool to help self-assess their progress toward developing productive
teams and creating units of instruction. Addressing these areas with fidelity will greatly enhance the adult practices and student
success in the building. In addition, districts and SEAs can participate in this self-assessment, gain valuable insights, and can then
provide targeted professional development and technical assistance to their schools.
Additional rubrics will be provided to help instructional teams assess their development and use of assessments and data systems to
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum and instructional strategies, make decisions about student placements, and
determine which students need additional support and/or enhancements.
Note: The entries within each cell are examples and are general and suggestive in nature. They are not a specific list that must be
followed exactly. In order to obtain a score of “III. Full Development or Implementation” the team should meet the conditions for
getting a score of “II. Limited Development or Implementation.”
Footnotes in the first column (“Component”) refer to specific Indicators of Effective Practice.
2
Instructional Team
Component:
(Footnotes refer
to Indicators of
Effective
Practice)
I. No
Development or
Implementation
II. Limited Development or
Implementation
III. Full Development or Implementation
Instructional
Team (IT)
Composition 1
 No IT exists  The IT includes limited representation:
o Classroom teachers
 The IT is organized by grade-level, grade-level cluster, or subject-
area with representation from the school and district staff, including:
o Special Education
o ELL
o Reading
o Math
o Instructional Coaches
o Administration
o District Support Specialists
Frequency of
IT Meetings2
 No meetings held  IT meetings held occasionally, but less
than twice a month to conduct business
 IT meetings held less than monthly for 4-
6 hours to develop and refine units of
instruction and review student learning
data
 IT meetings held twice a month to conduct business
 IT meetings held once a month for 4-6 hours to develop and refine
units of instruction and review student learning data
 IT meetings held whole days before and after the school year to
develop and refine units of instruction and review student learning
data
 IT meetings held more frequently, as needed
IT Attendance
and
Participation
 No IT exists  Some (not all) IT members attend
meetings
 Some (not all) IT members participate in
meetings
 All IT members attend regularly
 All IT members participate
 Additional staff and resource support are invited to attend some IT
meetings to add perspective and provide feedback
 All members engage in dialogue, questioning, and debate
1
Teachers are organized into grade-level, grade-level cluster, or subject-area Instructional Teams. Wise Ways Video
2
Instructional Teams meet regularly (twice a month or more for 45 minutes each meeting) to conduct business.
Instructional Teams meet for blocks of time (4 to 6 hour blocks, once a month; whole days before and after the school year) sufficient to develop and refine
units of instruction and review student learning data. Wise Ways Video
3
Instructional Team (Continued)
Component:
(Footnotes refer to
Indicators of
Effective Practice)
I. No
Development or
Implementation
II. Limited Development or
Implementation
III. Full Development or Implementation
Agendas3
 No agendas
created
 Agendas created for some meetings
 Agendas provide date, beginning and
ending times, and locations
 Agendas provide topics to be
discussed and/or decided
 Agendas created for all meetings
 Agendas distributed prior to meetings
 Agendas reviewed at the beginning of meetings
 Agendas revised, if necessary, at the beginning of meetings
Minutes4
 No minutes kept  Minutes from some IT meetings kept
 Minutes sometime reviewed at the
beginning of meetings
 Minutes sometimes distributed to
team members
 Minutes from all meetings kept
 Minutes from previous meeting reviewed at the beginning of
meetings
 Minutes accepted or revised to accurately reflect the previous
meeting
 Minutes emailed or otherwise distributed to all staff in a timely
manner before and after meetings
3
All teams prepare agendas for their meetings. Wise Ways
4
All teams maintain official minutes of their meetings. Wise Ways
4
Creating Units of Instruction
Component:
(Footnotes refer to
Indicators of Effective
Practice)
I. No Development
or Implementation
II. Limited Development or
Implementation
III. Full Development or Implementation
Units of instruction
created for each
subject and grade
level 5
 No units of
instruction created
for subjects or
grade levels
 Units of instruction created for
some subjects and/or grade levels
 Units of instruction created for
portions of the school year
 Units of instruction created for each subject and grade level
 Units of instruction created for the entire school year
 Units of instruction include all components (Indicators in Action
Instructional Planning Workbook, p. 15-16)
Units of instruction
align to standards/
benchmarks5
 No units of
instruction created
 Units of instruction
do not align to
standards/bench-
marks
 Some, not all, units of instruction
align to standards/ benchmarks
 Some units of instruction align to
inappropriate
standards/benchmarks for subject
and/or grade level.
 All units of instruction align to appropriate standards/benchmarks
for the subject and/or grade level
Units of instruction
include standards-
based objectives6
 No objectives
included
 Some units of instruction include
standards-based objectives
 Some objectives support the
standards.
 All units of instruction include a comprehensive list of standards-
based objectives
 All units of instruction support the standards-based objectives
5
Instructional Teams develop standards-aligned units of instruction for each subject and grade level. Wise Ways Video
6
Units of instruction include standards-based objectives and criteria for mastery. Wise Ways
5
Creating Units of Instruction (Continued)
Component:
(Footnotes refer to
Indicators of Effective
Practice)
I. No
Development or
Implementation
II. Limited Development or
Implementation
III. Full Development or Implementation
Units of instruction
include criteria for
mastery of
objectives6
 No criteria for
mastery
included
 Some units include criteria for
mastery
 All units of instruction include criteria
for mastery, and some need
adjustment to higher or lower levels of
achievement
 All units of instruction include appropriate criteria for mastery of
objectives
Units of instruction
include pre-/post-
tests to assess
student mastery of
objectives7
 No pre/post-
tests included
 Some units of instruction include pre-
/post-tests to assess student mastery of
objectives
 Some units of instruction are lacking
either pre- or post-tests
 Some pre-/post-tests require revision
to more effectively assess student
mastery of objectives
 All units of instruction include appropriate pre-/post tests that
accurately assess student mastery of objectives.
Units of instruction
include learning
activities8
 No learning
activities
included
 Some units of instruction include
learning activities
 Some learning activities meet the
needs of students in the grade level
and/or subject
 Some learning activities support the
objectives of the unit while other
learning activities do not
 Some units of instruction include
learning activities that align with the
pre-/post-tests while others do not
 All learning activities support the objectives of all units and align
with the pre-/post-tests
 All learning activities are engaging and appropriate for the grade
level and/or subject
 All learning activities allow for differentiation according to the
needs and capabilities of students in the grade level and/or subject
6
Units of instruction include standards-based objectives and criteria for mastery.
7
Units of instruction include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. Wise Way
8
Units of instruction include specific learning activities aligned to objectives. Wise Way
6
Creating Units of Instruction (Continued)
Component:
(Footnotes refer to
Indicators of Effective
Practice)
I. No
Development or
Implementation
II. Limited Development or
Implementation
III. Full Development or Implementation
Units of instruction
include instructional
strategies
 No instructional
strategies
included
 Some units of instruction refer to
appropriate instructional strategies
 Some instructional strategies are
appropriate for the learning activities (Not
all strategies are appropriate for all
activities and settings)
 Most instructional strategies are research
based as effective for setting and purpose
 All units of instruction include instructional strategies
 All instructional strategies are research based as effective for setting and
purpose
 All instructional strategies support the learning activities to which they
are applied