Skip to main content
UploadLanguage (EN)Support
BusinessMobileSocial MediaMarketingTechnologyArt & PhotosCareerDesignEducationPresentations & Public SpeakingGovernment & NonprofitHealthcareInternetLawLeadership & ManagementAutomotiveEngineeringSoftwareRecruiting & HRRetailSalesServicesScienceSmall Business & EntrepreneurshipFoodEnvironmentEconomy & FinanceData & AnalyticsInvestor RelationsSportsSpiritualNews & PoliticsTravelSelf ImprovementReal EstateEntertainment & HumorHealth & MedicineDevices & HardwareLifestyle
KS
Uploaded bykunguma selvan
PPTX, PDF1,436 views

Bottom up planning

The document discusses bottom-up planning in agricultural extension, emphasizing community involvement, transparency, and empowerment at the village level. It contrasts bottom-up planning with top-down approaches, highlighting benefits like increased motivation and participation. Additionally, the document outlines the role of the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) in technology dissemination and its objectives to improve agricultural practices through community feedback and partnerships.

Government & Nonprofit◦
Download to read offline
Bottom Up Planning KUNGUMASELVAN T 2019607011 I Ph.D.(Agricultural Extension)
Bottom Up Planning An established systematic process of achieving certain ends with accuracy and efficiency, usually in an ordered sequence of fixed steps Participation Empowerment
Planning initiated at the lowest level in the village level Bottom Up Planning Channel to each next step – higher authority Board of directors for final approval
Objectives of BUP • To involve the community • Draw out ideas and generate initiatives • Delegate decision making powers • Respect ideas and the people • Recognize driving needs • Transparency
Difference Sl.No Top Down Planning Bottom Up Planning 1 Inflexibility Flexibility 2 Less motivation More motivation 3 People feel that their opinion does not matter Commitment towards planning 4 Less or no participation of people More participation of people 5 Team work is not possible Teamwork is encouraged
Agriculture Technology Management Agency - NATP - 2006 ATMA Society of stakeholders involved in agri activities in the district Integration of extension and research with farmers Technology dissemination in district level
Objectives of ATMA • To strengthen REF linkage • Effective co-ordination of activities of different agencies involved in technology adoption • To increase the quality and type of technology disseminated • Shared ownership of the agriculture technology system by key shareholders • Develop partnership with private agencies
Salient features of ATMA Creating Farmer Advisory Committee to improve feedback Using NGO’S to organize farmers In-service training to increase staff competencies Developing PPP Refining technologies through ATMA centres in districts
Roles & Responsibilities Support Governing Board Management Committee Policy making body Provide guidance Review the progress & functioning of ATMA Planning & executing the day to day activities of ATMA
Governing Board 1 Collector Chairman
Management Committee
Funding pattern Funding Rs.226.07 crores Central State 90% 10% District State Control of GOI 77.53% 10.25% 12.22%
Strategy State District Block Village
State Level Sanctioning Committee RKVY Approve State Extension Working Plan Inter Departmental Working Group Support initiation Day to day management of activities State level
District level Governing Body Overall policy direction to ATMA District ATMA Cell Project Director Deputy PD Staffs ATMA Management Committee Implementation of scheme District Farmers Advisory Committee Feedback for planning & implementing
Block Technology Team Agri Officers & line dept staffs Block ATMA Cell BTM SMS Block Farmers Advisory Committee Feedback for planning & implementing Block level
Village level ATMA Farmers Farmer Friend Advice on agri and allied activities
Constraint – Naidu et al. (2016) Place of study : Andhra Pradesh Inadequate finance Lack of required staff Approval & release of fund Lack of guidance in for block action plan Lack of ICT tools Extension officials
Farmers • Unavailability of inputs at doorstep • Lack of training on improved technologies • Voice of farmer representatives have been often neglected • No proper planning in input distribution • No training on ICT and its application • Less exposure visits outside the state
Conclusion Bottom Up Planning ATMA activities
Bottom up planning