Skip to main content
Dr sumer yadavDr sumer yadav
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
 ORAL CANCER IS FIFTH MOST COMMONORAL CANCER IS FIFTH MOST COMMON
MALIGNANCY GLOBALLY.MALIGNANCY GLOBALLY.
 WESTERN WORLD # 2 TO 4 % OFWESTERN WORLD # 2 TO 4 % OF
MALIGNANT TUMORS.MALIGNANT TUMORS.
 ASIA # NOT LESS THAN 40%ASIA # NOT LESS THAN 40%
 RATIO OF MEN & WOMEN 3 : 1.RATIO OF MEN & WOMEN 3 : 1.
 APPROX AGE > 60 YEARSAPPROX AGE > 60 YEARS
 SOLID CONICAL MUSCULAR ORGAN,SOLID CONICAL MUSCULAR ORGAN,
COVERED BY MUCOUS MEMBRANE,COVERED BY MUCOUS MEMBRANE,
PRESENT IN ORAL CAVITY &PRESENT IN ORAL CAVITY &
OROPHARYNX.OROPHARYNX.
 ANT 2/3 ORAL TONGUE – FREELY MOBILEANT 2/3 ORAL TONGUE – FREELY MOBILE
& ANT. TO CIRCUMVALLATE PAPILLAE& ANT. TO CIRCUMVALLATE PAPILLAE
 POST 1/3 – BASE TONGUE – POST TOPOST 1/3 – BASE TONGUE – POST TO
CIRCUM VALLATE PAPILLAE &CIRCUM VALLATE PAPILLAE &
PALATOGLOSSAL ARCHPALATOGLOSSAL ARCH
 ANATOMIC REGION – TIP, LATERALANATOMIC REGION – TIP, LATERAL
BORDER, DORSUM & UNDER SURFACEBORDER, DORSUM & UNDER SURFACE
 EXTRINSIC & INTRINSIC MUSCLES AREEXTRINSIC & INTRINSIC MUSCLES ARE
ANATOMYANATOMY
 IT HELP IN MASTICATION, DEGLUTITION &IT HELP IN MASTICATION, DEGLUTITION &
SPEECHSPEECH
 RELATIVELY AVASCULAR MIDLINE -RELATIVELY AVASCULAR MIDLINE -
MARKED BY MEDIAN FIBROUS SEPTUMMARKED BY MEDIAN FIBROUS SEPTUM
 LINGUAL ARTRY – ECA AT Gr CORNU OFLINGUAL ARTRY – ECA AT Gr CORNU OF
HYOID BONEHYOID BONE
 DEEP VEIN – LINGUAL VEIN – IJVDEEP VEIN – LINGUAL VEIN – IJV
 NERVE SUPPLY –NERVE SUPPLY –
A. MOTORA. MOTOR
– ALL MUSCLE – HYPOGLOSSAL NERVEALL MUSCLE – HYPOGLOSSAL NERVE
– PALATOGLOSSAL – CRANIAL PART OFPALATOGLOSSAL – CRANIAL PART OF
SANSAN
B. SENSORYB. SENSORY
– ANT 2/3 – LINGUAL NERVE & CORDA TYNPANIANT 2/3 – LINGUAL NERVE & CORDA TYNPANI
– POST 1/3 & CIRCUMVALLETE PAPILLAE – IXPOST 1/3 & CIRCUMVALLETE PAPILLAE – IXTHTH
NERVE.NERVE.
LYMPHATIC DRAINAGELYMPHATIC DRAINAGE
– ARISES FROM SUBMUCOSAL PLEXUSARISES FROM SUBMUCOSAL PLEXUS
– APICALSET – TIP & FRENULUM – SUBMENTALAPICALSET – TIP & FRENULUM – SUBMENTAL
– MARGINAL SET – SIDE OF TONGUE –MARGINAL SET – SIDE OF TONGUE –
SUBMANDIBULARSUBMANDIBULAR
– CENTRAL SET – DORSUM – JUGULODIAGASTRIC &CENTRAL SET – DORSUM – JUGULODIAGASTRIC &
OMOHYOIDOMOHYOID
– BASAL SET – POST 1/3 - JUGULODIAGASTRIC &BASAL SET – POST 1/3 - JUGULODIAGASTRIC &
OMOHYOIDOMOHYOID
IN MIDLINE FREE DECUSSATING OF LYMPHATICIN MIDLINE FREE DECUSSATING OF LYMPHATIC
OCCUR & THEY PASSES BILATERALLYOCCUR & THEY PASSES BILATERALLY
 TIP OF TONGUE – RICHEST LYMPHATICTIP OF TONGUE – RICHEST LYMPHATIC
DRAINAGEDRAINAGE
 PRINCIPAL NODE– JUGULO OMOHYOIDPRINCIPAL NODE– JUGULO OMOHYOID
CARCINOMA TONGUE IS THE SECONDCARCINOMA TONGUE IS THE SECOND
MOST COMMON SITE OF ORAL CA AFTERMOST COMMON SITE OF ORAL CA AFTER
LIPLIP
SITE WISE INCIDENCE :-SITE WISE INCIDENCE :-
– MIDDLE 1/3 OF LATERAL BORDER OF TONGUEMIDDLE 1/3 OF LATERAL BORDER OF TONGUE
- 47% - COMMONEST SITE- 47% - COMMONEST SITE
POST 1/3 -20%POST 1/3 -20%
TIP - 15%TIP - 15%
– VENTRAL SURFACE & FRENULUM - 9%VENTRAL SURFACE & FRENULUM - 9%
– DORSUM - 6.5%DORSUM - 6.5%
– FACIO – LINGUAL - 6%FACIO – LINGUAL - 6%
AGE OF PRESENTATION = 60 YEARSAGE OF PRESENTATION = 60 YEARS
MEN > WOMENMEN > WOMEN
ETIOLOGYETIOLOGY
TOBACCO :TOBACCO :
 90% OF PATIENTS WITH CANCER USE90% OF PATIENTS WITH CANCER USE
TOBACCO.TOBACCO.
 RISK OF CARCINOMA INCREASES WITHRISK OF CARCINOMA INCREASES WITH
AMOUNT OF TOBACCO USED & DURATION OFAMOUNT OF TOBACCO USED & DURATION OF
HABIT.HABIT.
 EXPOSURE TO TOBACCO CAUSESEXPOSURE TO TOBACCO CAUSES
PROGRESSIVE SEQUENTIAL MORPHOLOGICPROGRESSIVE SEQUENTIAL MORPHOLOGIC
CHANGES OF MUCOSA LEADING TOCHANGES OF MUCOSA LEADING TO
NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION.NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION.
 SUCH CHANGES M/b REVERSIBLE IFSUCH CHANGES M/b REVERSIBLE IF
TOBACCO EXPOSURE IS ELIMINATED EARLY.TOBACCO EXPOSURE IS ELIMINATED EARLY.
 SO IT IS A PREVENTABLE DISEASESO IT IS A PREVENTABLE DISEASE
 40% OF PATIENTS WHO PERSISTED40% OF PATIENTS WHO PERSISTED
SMOKING AFTER PRESUMABLESMOKING AFTER PRESUMABLE
CURE OF ORAL CANCERCURE OF ORAL CANCER
DEVELOPED SECOND CANCERDEVELOPED SECOND CANCER
COMPARED TO 6% OF THOSE WHOCOMPARED TO 6% OF THOSE WHO
STOPPED SMOKINGSTOPPED SMOKING
 TOBACCO CONTAINS CARCINOGENSTOBACCO CONTAINS CARCINOGENS
THAT ACT DIRECTLY ON MUCOSATHAT ACT DIRECTLY ON MUCOSA
 INCIDENCE IN WOMEN ISINCIDENCE IN WOMEN IS
INCREASING BECAUSE OFINCREASING BECAUSE OF
INCREASING HABIT OF SMOKING &INCREASING HABIT OF SMOKING &
DRINKING.
ALCOHOLALCOHOL
 75-80% OF PATIENTS WITH CANCER75-80% OF PATIENTS WITH CANCER
CONSUME ALCOHOL.CONSUME ALCOHOL.
 6 TIMES > IN DRINKER THAN NON6 TIMES > IN DRINKER THAN NON
DRINKERDRINKER
 ALCOHOL ACT AS DIRECT IRRITANTALCOHOL ACT AS DIRECT IRRITANT
& ADD NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY.& ADD NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY.
 STUDY SHOWS THAT DYSPLASTICSTUDY SHOWS THAT DYSPLASTIC
CHANGES IN THE MUCOSA OF NONCHANGES IN THE MUCOSA OF NON
SMOKING ALCOHOLIC PATIENTS,SMOKING ALCOHOLIC PATIENTS,
SUGGESTING THAT ALCOHOL ITSELFSUGGESTING THAT ALCOHOL ITSELF
IS A CARCINOGEN.IS A CARCINOGEN.
 PERSONS USES BOTH ALCOHOL &PERSONS USES BOTH ALCOHOL &
TOBACCO ARE AT HIGHER RISKTOBACCO ARE AT HIGHER RISK
THAN THOSE USE ONE.THAN THOSE USE ONE.
 POOR ORAL & DENTALPOOR ORAL & DENTAL
HYGIENE.HYGIENE.
 CHRONIC IRRITATION FROMCHRONIC IRRITATION FROM
SHARP TOOTH, ORAL SEPSIS,SHARP TOOTH, ORAL SEPSIS,
SPICESSPICES
 SYPHILISSYPHILIS
 PLUMMER-VINSONPLUMMER-VINSON
SYNDROME.SYNDROME.
 VIT. A DEFICIENCYVIT. A DEFICIENCY
 ATAXA TELANGIECTASIA,ATAXA TELANGIECTASIA,
FANCONI ANEMIAFANCONI ANEMIA
 MARIJUANA = INCREASINGMARIJUANA = INCREASING
INCIDENCE TO TONGUE CANCERINCIDENCE TO TONGUE CANCER
IN YOUNG MALE.IN YOUNG MALE.
 VIRUS = HSV-I & HPV 2, 11, 16VIRUS = HSV-I & HPV 2, 11, 16
 FRESH FRUITS & VEGETABLESFRESH FRUITS & VEGETABLES
ARE PROTECTIVE.ARE PROTECTIVE.
PATHOLOGYPATHOLOGY
 95% OF TONGUE CANCER ARE SCC95% OF TONGUE CANCER ARE SCC
 RATIO OF SCC ANT 2/3 TO POST 1/3RATIO OF SCC ANT 2/3 TO POST 1/3
= 4:1= 4:1
 OTHERS – MELANOMA, SARCOMA,OTHERS – MELANOMA, SARCOMA,
MINOR SALIVARY GLAND CANCERMINOR SALIVARY GLAND CANCER
ADENOCYSTIC CARCINOMA,ADENOCYSTIC CARCINOMA,
ADENOCARCINOMAADENOCARCINOMA
 METASTATIC CA TONGUE IS RAREMETASTATIC CA TONGUE IS RARE
PREMALIGNANT CONDITIONPREMALIGNANT CONDITION
DEFINIT RISK OF MALIGNANT CHANGES:-DEFINIT RISK OF MALIGNANT CHANGES:-
1.1. LEUCOPLAKIALEUCOPLAKIA
2.2. ERYTHROPLAKIAERYTHROPLAKIA
3.3. CHRONIC HYPERPLASTIC CANDISIASISCHRONIC HYPERPLASTIC CANDISIASIS
LEUCOPLAKIALEUCOPLAKIA
 WHITE PLAQUE ON MUCOSA THAT CANWHITE PLAQUE ON MUCOSA THAT CAN
NOT BE REMOVED BY SCRAPING AND CANNOT BE REMOVED BY SCRAPING AND CAN
NOT BE CLASSIFIED CLINICALLY ORNOT BE CLASSIFIED CLINICALLY OR
PATHOLOGICALLY AS ANY OTHERPATHOLOGICALLY AS ANY OTHER
DISEASE.DISEASE.
 SMALL CIRCUMSCRIBED WHITE PLAQUESMALL CIRCUMSCRIBED WHITE PLAQUE
 SMOOTH, WRINKLED WITH FISSURESSMOOTH, WRINKLED WITH FISSURES
 WHITE TO YELLOWISH OR GREYWHITE TO YELLOWISH OR GREY
 HOMOGENOUS OR NODULAR SPECKLEDHOMOGENOUS OR NODULAR SPECKLED
 NODULAR & SPECKLED ARE MOST LIKELYNODULAR & SPECKLED ARE MOST LIKELY
TO UNDERGO MALIGNANT CHANGESTO UNDERGO MALIGNANT CHANGES
 INCIDENCE OF MALIGNANT CHANGESINCIDENCE OF MALIGNANT CHANGES
INCREASESINCREASES WITHWITH THE AGE OFTHE AGE OF
LEUCOPLAKIALEUCOPLAKIA
 2.4% MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION RATE2.4% MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION RATE
AT 10 YR.AT 10 YR.
 4% MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION RATE4% MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION RATE
AT 20 YR.AT 20 YR.
 MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION RISKMALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION RISK
INCREASES WITH THE AGE OF PATIENTSINCREASES WITH THE AGE OF PATIENTS
 < 50 YR.< 50 YR. – 1%– 1%
 70 - 89 YR.70 - 89 YR. – 7.5%– 7.5%
DURING 5 YEARS
OBSERVATION
 LEUCOPLAKIA OF FLOOR OFLEUCOPLAKIA OF FLOOR OF
MOUTH & VENTRAL SURFACE OFMOUTH & VENTRAL SURFACE OF
TONGUE HAS HIGH INCIDENCE OFTONGUE HAS HIGH INCIDENCE OF
MALIGNANCYMALIGNANCY
 INDURATIONS S/o MALIGNANTINDURATIONS S/o MALIGNANT
CHANGES, INDICATION FORCHANGES, INDICATION FOR
BIOPSYBIOPSY
 TRETMENT WITH SURGICALTRETMENT WITH SURGICAL
EXCESION OR CO2 LASEREXCESION OR CO2 LASER
ERYTHROPLAKIAERYTHROPLAKIA
 ANY LESION OF ORAL MUCOSA THATANY LESION OF ORAL MUCOSA THAT
PRESENT AS BRIGHT RED VELVETYPRESENT AS BRIGHT RED VELVETY
PLAQUE THAT CAN NOT BEPLAQUE THAT CAN NOT BE
CHARACTERIZED CLINICALLY ORCHARACTERIZED CLINICALLY OR
PATHOLOGICALLY ANY OTHER DISEASEPATHOLOGICALLY ANY OTHER DISEASE
 IRREGULAR & CLEARLY DEMARCATEDIRREGULAR & CLEARLY DEMARCATED
FROM NORMAL EPITHELIUMFROM NORMAL EPITHELIUM
 INCIDENCE OF MALIGNANT CHANGES ISINCIDENCE OF MALIGNANT CHANGES IS
17 TIME HIGHER THAN LEUCOPLAKIA17 TIME HIGHER THAN LEUCOPLAKIA
 MUST BE EXCISED SURGICALLY.MUST BE EXCISED SURGICALLY.
OTHERS LESIONSOTHERS LESIONS
 ORAL SUBMUCOUSORAL SUBMUCOUS
FIBROSISFIBROSIS
SYPHILITIC GLOSSITISSYPHILITIC GLOSSITIS
SIDEROPENICSIDEROPENIC
DYSPHASIADYSPHASIA
ORAL LICHEN PLANUSORAL LICHEN PLANUS
PATHOLOGICAL VARIETIESPATHOLOGICAL VARIETIES
1.1. ULCERATIVEULCERATIVE
2.2. WARTY GROWTHWARTY GROWTH
3.3. INDURATED PLAQUE OR MASSINDURATED PLAQUE OR MASS
4.4. FISSUREFISSURE
 ULCERATIVE VARIETY COMMONESTULCERATIVE VARIETY COMMONEST
 IRREGULAR WITH EVERTED EDGES &IRREGULAR WITH EVERTED EDGES &
INDURATED BASEINDURATED BASE
 WARTY GROWTH IS USUALLYWARTY GROWTH IS USUALLY
SUPERIMPOSED ON PREVIOUSSUPERIMPOSED ON PREVIOUS
LEUCOPLAKIALEUCOPLAKIA
 FISSURE IS CHRONIC & FOLLOWSFISSURE IS CHRONIC & FOLLOWS
CHRONIC SUPERFECIAL GLOSSITITS ORCHRONIC SUPERFECIAL GLOSSITITS OR
SYPHILISSYPHILIS
MODE OF SPREADMODE OF SPREAD
LOCAL SPREADLOCAL SPREAD
 BY INFILTRATION & INVASIONBY INFILTRATION & INVASION
 ANT 2/3 OF TONGUE – FLOOR OF MOUTH,ANT 2/3 OF TONGUE – FLOOR OF MOUTH,
CROSS THE MIDLINECROSS THE MIDLINE
 MANDIBLE INFILTRATION OCCUR THROUGHMANDIBLE INFILTRATION OCCUR THROUGH
ITS DENTAL SOCKET OR EDENTULOUSITS DENTAL SOCKET OR EDENTULOUS
ALVEOLAR RIDGE, CELLS PROCEED ALONGALVEOLAR RIDGE, CELLS PROCEED ALONG
THE ROOT OF TOOTH INTO THETHE ROOT OF TOOTH INTO THE
CANCELLOUS PART OF MANDIBLE & THANCANCELLOUS PART OF MANDIBLE & THAN
ALONG THE MANDIBULAR CANAL.ALONG THE MANDIBULAR CANAL.
 POST 1/3 OF TONGUE – TONSIL, PHARYNX,POST 1/3 OF TONGUE – TONSIL, PHARYNX,
PALATE, EPIGLOTTIS.PALATE, EPIGLOTTIS.
LYMPHATIC SPREAD:LYMPHATIC SPREAD:
 FREQUENTLY METASTASIZES B/LFREQUENTLY METASTASIZES B/L
 POST 1/3 EMBOLIC SPREAD NOT BYPOST 1/3 EMBOLIC SPREAD NOT BY
PERMEATIONPERMEATION
 B/L SPREAD - 25%B/L SPREAD - 25%
 CONTRALATRAL SPREAD - 3%CONTRALATRAL SPREAD - 3%
BLOOD SPREAD ISBLOOD SPREAD IS
RARE MOSTLY WITH POST 1/3RARE MOSTLY WITH POST 1/3
CLINICAL FEATURESCLINICAL FEATURES
 COMMEST PRESENTATION IS PAINLESSCOMMEST PRESENTATION IS PAINLESS
LUMP OR ULCER ON THE SURFACE OFLUMP OR ULCER ON THE SURFACE OF
TONGUE.TONGUE.
 EXCESSIVE SALIVATION – ELDERLY MANEXCESSIVE SALIVATION – ELDERLY MAN
SITTING IN OPD WITH FREQUENTSITTING IN OPD WITH FREQUENT
SPITTING IN TO HANDKERCHIEF .SPITTING IN TO HANDKERCHIEF .
 PAIN – LATE FEATUREPAIN – LATE FEATURE
– DUE TO INVOLVEMENT OF NERVESDUE TO INVOLVEMENT OF NERVES
– LOCALISED OR REFERRED TO EARLOCALISED OR REFERRED TO EAR
– ON SWALLOWING – IN POST 1/3 TONGUE CAON SWALLOWING – IN POST 1/3 TONGUE CA
 DIFFICULTY IN SPEECH – POST 1/3DIFFICULTY IN SPEECH – POST 1/3
TONGUE CANCERTONGUE CANCER
 INFILTRATION OF MUSCLES & FLOORINFILTRATION OF MUSCLES & FLOOR
OF MOUTH – ANKYLO GLOSSIAOF MOUTH – ANKYLO GLOSSIA
 FETOR ORIS, BLEEDING PRESENTFETOR ORIS, BLEEDING PRESENT
DUE TO TUMOR NECROSIS &DUE TO TUMOR NECROSIS &
INFECTION.INFECTION.
 TRISMUS - INVOLVEMENT OFTRISMUS - INVOLVEMENT OF
PTERYGOID MUSCLEPTERYGOID MUSCLE
 MANDIBULAR ANESTHESIA – BONEMANDIBULAR ANESTHESIA – BONE
EROSION WITH INVOLMENT OFEROSION WITH INVOLMENT OF
ALVEOLAR NERVE.ALVEOLAR NERVE.
DIAGNOSTIC STUDYDIAGNOSTIC STUDY
 CLINICAL EXAMINATION WITH HIGH INDEX OFCLINICAL EXAMINATION WITH HIGH INDEX OF
CLINICAL SUSPICION.CLINICAL SUSPICION.
 BIOPSY- INCISIONAL BIOPSY OF MOSTBIOPSY- INCISIONAL BIOPSY OF MOST
SUSPICIOUS PART WITH NORMAL ADJOININGSUSPICIOUS PART WITH NORMAL ADJOINING
MUCOSA IS MANDATORY BEFORE PLANNINGMUCOSA IS MANDATORY BEFORE PLANNING
TREATMENT. BIOPSY CAN BE TAKEN UNDERTREATMENT. BIOPSY CAN BE TAKEN UNDER
LA.LA.
 FNAC – FROM NECK NODES.FNAC – FROM NECK NODES.
 ORTHOPANTOMOGRAM (OPG) OR OBLIQUEORTHOPANTOMOGRAM (OPG) OR OBLIQUE
VIEW RADIOGRAPH OF MANDIBLE ISVIEW RADIOGRAPH OF MANDIBLE IS
EFFECTIVE INITIAL INVESTIGATION TOEFFECTIVE INITIAL INVESTIGATION TO
ASSESS MANDIBULAR INVASION.ASSESS MANDIBULAR INVASION.
 CT SCANCT SCAN - FOR CERVICAL METASTASIS- FOR CERVICAL METASTASIS
INFILTRATION OF MANDIBLE.INFILTRATION OF MANDIBLE.
 MRI –MRI – INVESTIGATION OF CHOICE FORINVESTIGATION OF CHOICE FOR
IMAGING SOFT TISSUE INFILTRATION. CANIMAGING SOFT TISSUE INFILTRATION. CAN
DETECT PERINEURAL INVASION.DETECT PERINEURAL INVASION.
 X-RAY –X-RAY – LIMITED VALUE D/T COMPLEXITYLIMITED VALUE D/T COMPLEXITY
OF FASICAL BONE. MAY SHOWOF FASICAL BONE. MAY SHOW
PULMONARY METASTASIS.PULMONARY METASTASIS.
 ROUTINE INVESTIGATION WITH VDRL/ROUTINE INVESTIGATION WITH VDRL/
KHANS TEST ETC.KHANS TEST ETC.
 DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY – FOR BASE OFDIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY – FOR BASE OF
TONGUE CA & TO KNOW THE FIELDTONGUE CA & TO KNOW THE FIELD
CANCERIZATION (SYNCHRONOS ANDCANCERIZATION (SYNCHRONOS AND
METACHRONOUS SECONDMETACHRONOUS SECOND
MALIGNANCIES)MALIGNANCIES)
STAGING OF TONGUE CANCERSTAGING OF TONGUE CANCER
 PRIMARY TUMOR (T)PRIMARY TUMOR (T)
TxTx -- TUMOR CAN NOT BE ASSESSEDTUMOR CAN NOT BE ASSESSED
T0T0 -- NO EVIDENCE OF PNO EVIDENCE OF P00
TUMORTUMOR
TisTis -- CARCINOMA IN SITUCARCINOMA IN SITU
T1T1 -- GREATEST DIAMETER =GREATEST DIAMETER = ≤ 2 cm.≤ 2 cm.
T2T2 -- > 2 cm. TO 4 cm.> 2 cm. TO 4 cm.
T3T3 -- > 4 cm.> 4 cm.
T4T4 -- ORAL TONGUEORAL TONGUE
T4aT4a -- INVASION OF CORTICAL BONE,INVASION OF CORTICAL BONE,
DEEP EXTRINSIC MUSCLE,DEEP EXTRINSIC MUSCLE,
MAXILLARY SINUS, SKIN OFMAXILLARY SINUS, SKIN OF
FACE.FACE.
T4bT4b -- PTERYGOID PLATE SKULLPTERYGOID PLATE SKULL
BASE, INVOLVEMENT OF ICABASE, INVOLVEMENT OF ICA
T4T4 -- BASE OF TONGUEBASE OF TONGUE
T4aT4a -- LARYNX, MEDIAL PTERYGOID,LARYNX, MEDIAL PTERYGOID,
HARD PALATE, MANDIBLEHARD PALATE, MANDIBLE
T4bT4b -- LATERAL PTERYGOID,LATERAL PTERYGOID,
NASOPHARYNX , ICA,.NASOPHARYNX , ICA,.
LYMPH NODELYMPH NODE
 Nx – REGIONAL LN CAN NOT BE ASSESSEDNx – REGIONAL LN CAN NOT BE ASSESSED
 N0 – NO NODAL METASTASISN0 – NO NODAL METASTASIS
 N1 – IPSILATERAL SINGLE LNN1 – IPSILATERAL SINGLE LN ≤≤ 3cm.3cm.
 N2 :N2 :
– N2A – IPSILATERAL SINGLE LN > 3cm. - 6 cm.N2A – IPSILATERAL SINGLE LN > 3cm. - 6 cm.
– N2B – IPSILATERAL MULTIPLE LNN2B – IPSILATERAL MULTIPLE LN ≤ 6 cm.≤ 6 cm.
– N2C – BILATERAL / CONTRALATERAL LNN2C – BILATERAL / CONTRALATERAL LN ≤ 6 cm.≤ 6 cm.
 N3 – ANY NODE > 6 cm.N3 – ANY NODE > 6 cm.
 MIDLINE NODES ARE CONSIDERED ASMIDLINE NODES ARE CONSIDERED AS
IPSILATERALIPSILATERAL
DISTANT METASTASISDISTANT METASTASIS
 MxMx –– CAN NOT BECAN NOT BE
ASSESSEDASSESSED
 M0M0 –– NO DETECTABLENO DETECTABLE
DISTANTDISTANT
METASTASISMETASTASIS
 M1M1 –– DISTANTDISTANT
METASTASISMETASTASIS
PRESENTPRESENT
CLINICAL STAGING GROUPINGCLINICAL STAGING GROUPING
STAGE T N M
I T1 N0 M0
II T2 N0 M0
III T1 N1 M0
T2 N1 M0
T3 NO/N1 M0
IV A T4 N0 M0
T4 N1 M0
ANY T N2 M0
IV B ANY T N3 M0
IV C ANY T ANY N M1
TREATMENTSTREATMENTS
 CHOICE OF TREATMENT DEPENDSCHOICE OF TREATMENT DEPENDS
UPON VARIOUS FACTORSUPON VARIOUS FACTORS
 SITE OF DISEASESITE OF DISEASE
 STAGE OF DISEASE:STAGE OF DISEASE:
– EARLYEARLY – SURGERY– SURGERY
– INTERMEDIATE – BOTH (Surgery & RT)INTERMEDIATE – BOTH (Surgery & RT)
– ADVANCEDADVANCED – BOTH (Surgery & RT)– BOTH (Surgery & RT)
 PREVIOUS IRRADIATIONPREVIOUS IRRADIATION
 PATIENTS PHYSICAL / SOCIAL &PATIENTS PHYSICAL / SOCIAL &
PERSONAL STATUSPERSONAL STATUS
 SURGEON'S EXPERIENCE & SKILLSURGEON'S EXPERIENCE & SKILL
 AVAILABILITY OF TREATMENTAVAILABILITY OF TREATMENT
FACILITIESFACILITIES
SURGICAL TREATMENTSSURGICAL TREATMENTS
AIMs OF SURGERYAIMs OF SURGERY
 COMPLETE EXCISION OF PRIMARY,COMPLETE EXCISION OF PRIMARY,
THREE DIMENSIONALLY WITH RoTHREE DIMENSIONALLY WITH Ro
(MICROSCOPICALLY CLEAR) MARGINS.(MICROSCOPICALLY CLEAR) MARGINS.
 Rx OF LNRx OF LN
 RECONSTRUCTION OF TISSUE LOSS TORECONSTRUCTION OF TISSUE LOSS TO
PROVIDE RAPID HEALING,PROVIDE RAPID HEALING,
RESTORATION OF FUNCTION &RESTORATION OF FUNCTION &
APPEARANCE TO IMPROVE QUALITY OFAPPEARANCE TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF
LIFE.LIFE.
LOCAL EXCISIONLOCAL EXCISION
 PER ORAL RESECTION IN SMALLPER ORAL RESECTION IN SMALL
LESION (≤ 2cm.) LOCATED AT TIP,LESION (≤ 2cm.) LOCATED AT TIP,
LATERAL BORDER ANT 2/3 OFLATERAL BORDER ANT 2/3 OF
TONGUE THAT ARETONGUE THAT ARE
APPROACHABLE 2 cm. MARGINAPPROACHABLE 2 cm. MARGIN
 LOCALISED PREMALIGNANTLOCALISED PREMALIGNANT
LESION ARE ALSO TREATED BYLESION ARE ALSO TREATED BY
THIS METHOD.THIS METHOD.
 LASER EXCESION – MINIMALLASER EXCESION – MINIMAL
BLEED, SCAR&RAPID HEALINGBLEED, SCAR&RAPID HEALING
PARTIAL GLOSSECTOMY WITHPARTIAL GLOSSECTOMY WITH
SPARING OF MANDIBLESPARING OF MANDIBLE
 APPLICABLE FOR SMALL SUPERFICIAL WELLAPPLICABLE FOR SMALL SUPERFICIAL WELL
DIFFERENTIATED LESION OF ORAL TONGUEDIFFERENTIATED LESION OF ORAL TONGUE
WHICH ARE TWO LARGE FOR LOCALWHICH ARE TWO LARGE FOR LOCAL
EXCISION & TUMOR NOT INVOLVING THEEXCISION & TUMOR NOT INVOLVING THE
MANDIBLE.MANDIBLE.
 USUALLY DONE ALONG WITH BLOCKUSUALLY DONE ALONG WITH BLOCK
DISSECTION OF NECKDISSECTION OF NECK
 INCISION: MASTOID TIP TO MID LINE CHININCISION: MASTOID TIP TO MID LINE CHIN
TWO FINGER BELOW THE LOWER BORDERTWO FINGER BELOW THE LOWER BORDER
OF MANDIBLEOF MANDIBLE
 RIGHT ANGLE TO UPPER INCISION & POST TORIGHT ANGLE TO UPPER INCISION & POST TO
CAROTID ARTERY & DOWNWORD UP TO THECAROTID ARTERY & DOWNWORD UP TO THE
CLAVICLECLAVICLE
 BLOCK DISSECTION ISBLOCK DISSECTION IS
COMPLETED TO THE LEVEL OFCOMPLETED TO THE LEVEL OF
HYOID & CAROTID BIFURCATIONHYOID & CAROTID BIFURCATION
 LINGUAL ARTERY IS LEGATEDLINGUAL ARTERY IS LEGATED
NEAR THE HYOIDNEAR THE HYOID
 IPSILATERAL SUBMANDIBULARIPSILATERAL SUBMANDIBULAR
GLAND IS SEPARATED FROMGLAND IS SEPARATED FROM
INFERIOR SURFACE OF MANDIBLEINFERIOR SURFACE OF MANDIBLE
 FACIAL VESSELS ARE LIGATEDFACIAL VESSELS ARE LIGATED
 LIP IS SPLIT IN MIDLINE.LIP IS SPLIT IN MIDLINE.
PERIOSTEUM IS ELEVATED FROMPERIOSTEUM IS ELEVATED FROM
EXT. SURFACE OF MANDIBLE FOREXT. SURFACE OF MANDIBLE FOR
2 cm. IN BOTH THE DIRECTION2 cm. IN BOTH THE DIRECTION
 INNER PERIOSTEUM ELEVATEDINNER PERIOSTEUM ELEVATED
FROM SYMPHISIS TO ANGLEFROM SYMPHISIS TO ANGLE
 TOOTH , LATERAL INCISOR ISTOOTH , LATERAL INCISOR IS
EXTRACTEDEXTRACTED
 MANDIBLE IS DIVIDED JUST OFFMANDIBLE IS DIVIDED JUST OFF
THE MIDLINE WITH GIGLI SAW.THE MIDLINE WITH GIGLI SAW.
 MUCOSAL INCISION IS MADE INMUCOSAL INCISION IS MADE IN
GINGIVO LINGUAL SULCUSGINGIVO LINGUAL SULCUS
FROM THE POINT OFFROM THE POINT OF
MANDIBULAR DIVISION TO THEMANDIBULAR DIVISION TO THE
ANT PILLARANT PILLAR
 LEAVING 5MM OF FREE MUCOSALEAVING 5MM OF FREE MUCOSA
ATTACHED TO MANDIBLEATTACHED TO MANDIBLE
 MANDIBLE IS RETRACTED LATERALLYMANDIBLE IS RETRACTED LATERALLY
 TRACTION SUTURES ARE APPLIED INTRACTION SUTURES ARE APPLIED IN
THE TIP OF TONGUETHE TIP OF TONGUE
 GLOSSECTOMY IS PERFORMED WITHGLOSSECTOMY IS PERFORMED WITH
DIATHERMY TO MAXIMIZEDIATHERMY TO MAXIMIZE
HEMOSTASIS & 2 CM MARGIN OFHEMOSTASIS & 2 CM MARGIN OF
NORMAL TONGUE IS MAINTAIND INNORMAL TONGUE IS MAINTAIND IN
ALL DIRECTION.ALL DIRECTION.
 CAUTRY INCISION IS MADE IN MIDLINECAUTRY INCISION IS MADE IN MIDLINE
OF TONGUE FROM ANT TO POST.OF TONGUE FROM ANT TO POST.
 ANT FROM TIP TO FLOOR &FROMANT FROM TIP TO FLOOR &FROM
POST TURNING TO LATERALLY UP TOPOST TURNING TO LATERALLY UP TO
THE ANT PILLAR.THE ANT PILLAR.
 WHOLE TISSUE IS TAKEN WITHWHOLE TISSUE IS TAKEN WITH
BLOCK DISSECTION SPECIMEN.BLOCK DISSECTION SPECIMEN.
MANDIBULAR FRAGMENTS AREMANDIBULAR FRAGMENTS ARE
REALIGNED &STABILISED WITHREALIGNED &STABILISED WITH
STEEL WIRE OR TITANEUM PLATESTEEL WIRE OR TITANEUM PLATE
 TONGUE DEFECT CAN BE COVEREDTONGUE DEFECT CAN BE COVERED
WITH FREE SKIN GRAFT OR PMMCWITH FREE SKIN GRAFT OR PMMC
FLAPFLAP
 WOUND IS CLOSED UNDER VACUUMWOUND IS CLOSED UNDER VACUUM
SUCTION.SUCTION.
MARGINAN MANDIBULECTOMYMARGINAN MANDIBULECTOMY
 INDICATED IN CANCER IN CLOSEINDICATED IN CANCER IN CLOSE
PROXIMITY TO LOWER GINGIVAL ORPROXIMITY TO LOWER GINGIVAL OR
EXTENDING TO MANDIBLE WITHOUTEXTENDING TO MANDIBLE WITHOUT
CLINICAL OR RADIOLOGICALCLINICAL OR RADIOLOGICAL
INVOLVEMENT OR WITH MINIMALINVOLVEMENT OR WITH MINIMAL
CORTICAL INVASION.CORTICAL INVASION.
 INVOLVES THE INCONTINUITY EXCESIONINVOLVES THE INCONTINUITY EXCESION
OF TUMOR WITH MARGIN OF MANDIBLEOF TUMOR WITH MARGIN OF MANDIBLE
AND OVERLYING GINGIVAL.AND OVERLYING GINGIVAL.
 MADIBULAR CONTINUITY IS MAINTAINEDMADIBULAR CONTINUITY IS MAINTAINED
AND MUCH BETTER COSMETIC &AND MUCH BETTER COSMETIC &
FUNCTIONAL END RESULT ACHIEVED.IFFUNCTIONAL END RESULT ACHIEVED.IF
MANDIBLE IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED THANMANDIBLE IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED THAN
SEGMENTAL MANDIBULECTOMY IS DONE.SEGMENTAL MANDIBULECTOMY IS DONE.
TOTAL GLOSSECTOMYTOTAL GLOSSECTOMY
 INDICATED FOR MASSIVE LOCALINDICATED FOR MASSIVE LOCAL
CARCINOMA OF TONGUECARCINOMA OF TONGUE
 LIP IS SPLIT IN MIDLINELIP IS SPLIT IN MIDLINE
 B/L CHEEK FLAP ARE RAISED BEYONDB/L CHEEK FLAP ARE RAISED BEYOND
THE ANGLE OF MANDIBLETHE ANGLE OF MANDIBLE
 MUCOSA IS INCISED IN BOTHMUCOSA IS INCISED IN BOTH
GINGIVO-BUCCAL SULCUS BACK TOGINGIVO-BUCCAL SULCUS BACK TO
THE ANT PILLARTHE ANT PILLAR
 ASENDING RAMI OF MANDIBLE ISASENDING RAMI OF MANDIBLE IS
DIVIDEDDIVIDED
 WHOLE SPECIMEN IS TAKEN OUTWHOLE SPECIMEN IS TAKEN OUT
 K –WIRE CAN BE INSERTED FORK –WIRE CAN BE INSERTED FOR
MANDIBLEMANDIBLE
 DEFECT OF TOTAL GLOSSECTOMYDEFECT OF TOTAL GLOSSECTOMY
CONSISTS OF TONGUE, FLOOR OFCONSISTS OF TONGUE, FLOOR OF
MOUTH & SOME TISSUE PHARYNGEALMOUTH & SOME TISSUE PHARYNGEAL
& LARYNGEAL MUCOSA.& LARYNGEAL MUCOSA.
 PECTORALIS MAJOR FLAP ORPECTORALIS MAJOR FLAP OR
TEMPARAL FLAP CAN GIVE GOODTEMPARAL FLAP CAN GIVE GOOD
RESULT.RESULT.
 CARCINOMA OF BASE OF TONGUECARCINOMA OF BASE OF TONGUE
ARE USUALLY ADVANCE & METASTICARE USUALLY ADVANCE & METASTIC
AT THE TIME OF PRESENTATIONAT THE TIME OF PRESENTATION
 TREATMENT OF POST 1/3 OF TONGUETREATMENT OF POST 1/3 OF TONGUE
IS USUALLY TELE THERAPY SINCEIS USUALLY TELE THERAPY SINCE
THE SITE IS ANATOMICALLYTHE SITE IS ANATOMICALLY
DIFFICULT FOR BOTH SURGERY ANDDIFFICULT FOR BOTH SURGERY AND
FOR INTERSTITIAL IRRADIATION.FOR INTERSTITIAL IRRADIATION.
MEDIAN TRANSLINGUIAL PHARYNGOTOMYMEDIAN TRANSLINGUIAL PHARYNGOTOMY
 MID LINE OF TONGUE IS INCISED,MID LINE OF TONGUE IS INCISED,
BISECTING THE TONGUE IN TWO b/lBISECTING THE TONGUE IN TWO b/l
SEGMENTSEGMENT
 INCISION EXTEND BACK TO THE AREAINCISION EXTEND BACK TO THE AREA
OF TUMOR IN THE BASE OF TONGUE.OF TUMOR IN THE BASE OF TONGUE.
 TUMOR IS EXCISED & WOUNDTUMOR IS EXCISED & WOUND
CAN BE CLOSED PRIMARILY.CAN BE CLOSED PRIMARILY.
 MID LINE OF TONGUE ISMID LINE OF TONGUE IS
INCISED, BISECTING THEINCISED, BISECTING THE
TONGUE IN TWO b/l SEGMENTTONGUE IN TWO b/l SEGMENT
 INCISION EXTEND BACK TO THEINCISION EXTEND BACK TO THE
AREA OF TUMOR IN THE BASEAREA OF TUMOR IN THE BASE
OF TONGUE.OF TONGUE.
 TUMOR IS EXCISED & WOUNDTUMOR IS EXCISED & WOUND
CAN BE CLOSED PRIMARILY.CAN BE CLOSED PRIMARILY.
TRANS HYOID PHARYNGOTOMYTRANS HYOID PHARYNGOTOMY
 COLLAR INCISION IS MADE ATCOLLAR INCISION IS MADE AT
HYOID LEVEL b/w THE SCMHYOID LEVEL b/w THE SCM
MUSCLES.MUSCLES.
 SKIN FLAPS ELEVATEDSKIN FLAPS ELEVATED
 SUPAR & INFRA HYOIDSUPAR & INFRA HYOID
MUSCLES ARE EXCISEDMUSCLES ARE EXCISED
 CENTRAL PORTION OF HYOIDCENTRAL PORTION OF HYOID
IS EXCISED.IS EXCISED.
 TUMOR AT BASE IS EXCISEDTUMOR AT BASE IS EXCISED
WITH 2 cm. MARGIN.WITH 2 cm. MARGIN.
 AVOID INJURY TO LINGUALAVOID INJURY TO LINGUAL
ARTERY & HYPOGLOSSALARTERY & HYPOGLOSSAL
NERVE.NERVE.
 DEFECT IS CLOSED PRIMARILY.DEFECT IS CLOSED PRIMARILY.
 IF TUMOR HAS INVOLVED THEIF TUMOR HAS INVOLVED THE
EPIGLOTTIS & PART OFEPIGLOTTIS & PART OF
GLOTTIS. THEN SUPRAGLOTTICGLOTTIS. THEN SUPRAGLOTTIC
LARYGECTOMY CAN BE DONE.LARYGECTOMY CAN BE DONE.
 ADVANCE STAGE CARCINOMA OFADVANCE STAGE CARCINOMA OF
TONGUE REQUIRED COMBINEDTONGUE REQUIRED COMBINED
MODALITY OF RADICAL SURGERYMODALITY OF RADICAL SURGERY
WITH RECONSTRUCTIONWITH RECONSTRUCTION
FOLLOWED BY POST OPERATIVE RTFOLLOWED BY POST OPERATIVE RT
 COMMANDO OPERATION CONSISTSCOMMANDO OPERATION CONSISTS
OF COMPOSITE RESECTION OFOF COMPOSITE RESECTION OF
PRIMARY MALIGNANCY,PRIMARY MALIGNANCY,
HEMIMANDIBULECTOMY WITHHEMIMANDIBULECTOMY WITH
IPSILATERAL OR BILATERAL RND.IPSILATERAL OR BILATERAL RND.
 USEFUL IN FAR ADVANCEDUSEFUL IN FAR ADVANCED
CARCINOMA.CARCINOMA.
DELEOPECTORAL SKIN FLAPDELEOPECTORAL SKIN FLAP
MANDIBULAR TONGUE PROSTHESISMANDIBULAR TONGUE PROSTHESIS
RADIO THERAPYRADIO THERAPY
RT & SURGERY HAVE EQUAL SUCCESSRT & SURGERY HAVE EQUAL SUCCESS
IN EARLY LESION. RT CAN BE GIVEN:IN EARLY LESION. RT CAN BE GIVEN:
 BRACHYTHERPYBRACHYTHERPY
 TELE THERAPY – EBRTTELE THERAPY – EBRT
 COMBINATION THERAPYCOMBINATION THERAPY
 RT MAY HELP IN ORGAN PRESERVTIONRT MAY HELP IN ORGAN PRESERVTION
BUT LONG TERM COMPLICATION AREBUT LONG TERM COMPLICATION ARE
SIGNIFICANTSIGNIFICANT
 XEROSTOMIA, ERYTHEMA, SKINXEROSTOMIA, ERYTHEMA, SKIN
SLOUGHING, ULCERATION, DENTALSLOUGHING, ULCERATION, DENTAL
CARIES & OSTEORADIONECROSIS.CARIES & OSTEORADIONECROSIS.
 POST OPERATIVE RT IS PREFERRED OVERPOST OPERATIVE RT IS PREFERRED OVER
PRE OPERATIVE B/C OF EFFECT ONPRE OPERATIVE B/C OF EFFECT ON
WOUND HEALINGWOUND HEALING
 PER OPERATIVE RT: INOPERABLE, UNFITPER OPERATIVE RT: INOPERABLE, UNFIT
FOR SURGERY& DOWN STAGINGFOR SURGERY& DOWN STAGING
 POST RT IS INDICATED IN PATIENTS WITHPOST RT IS INDICATED IN PATIENTS WITH
– TT33/T/T44 PRIMARYPRIMARY
– POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINESPOSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINES
– PERINEURAL, PERILYMPHATICPERINEURAL, PERILYMPHATIC
VASCULAR INVASIONVASCULAR INVASION
– MIOROSCOPIC GROSS RESIDUAL TUMORMIOROSCOPIC GROSS RESIDUAL TUMOR
– EXTRA CAPSULAR SPREADEXTRA CAPSULAR SPREAD
– PATHOLOGICALLY POSITIVE LN AFTERPATHOLOGICALLY POSITIVE LN AFTER
SOHNDSOHND
 EBRT DOSE – 6500 TO 7000 RAD TOEBRT DOSE – 6500 TO 7000 RAD TO
PRIMARY & NECK FOR CLINICALLYPRIMARY & NECK FOR CLINICALLY
EVIDENT DISEASE.EVIDENT DISEASE.
 WIDE MARGIN OF TONGUE CAN BEWIDE MARGIN OF TONGUE CAN BE
TREATEDTREATED
 GIVEN AS 200 RAD PER DAY OVER 5 TOGIVEN AS 200 RAD PER DAY OVER 5 TO
7 WEEKS.7 WEEKS.
 BRACHYTHERAPHY CAN DELIVERBRACHYTHERAPHY CAN DELIVER
LARGER DOSE TO THE GIVEN TISSUE.LARGER DOSE TO THE GIVEN TISSUE.
 IRIDIUM 192,CAESIUM137, NEEDLESIRIDIUM 192,CAESIUM137, NEEDLES
ARE USED.ARE USED.
 IT REQUIRE ACCURATE SPACING OFIT REQUIRE ACCURATE SPACING OF
INTERSTITIAL SEEDS OR NEEDLES TOINTERSTITIAL SEEDS OR NEEDLES TO
PREVENT OVERLAPPING OFPREVENT OVERLAPPING OF
RADIATION.RADIATION.
 PRECISE DOSIMETRY ACHIEVED BYPRECISE DOSIMETRY ACHIEVED BY
AFTER LOADING TECHNIQUE.AFTER LOADING TECHNIQUE.
 RADIOACTIV SOURCE IS INSERTED INRADIOACTIV SOURCE IS INSERTED IN
TO PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED HOLLOWTO PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED HOLLOW
NYLON TUBES.NYLON TUBES.
 TUBES ARE PLACED UNDER GATUBES ARE PLACED UNDER GA
 AS MUCH AS 10000 RAD CAN BEAS MUCH AS 10000 RAD CAN BE
DELIVERD TO SMALL AREA WITHDELIVERD TO SMALL AREA WITH
GREATER EFFECT.GREATER EFFECT.
 PROPHYLACTIC RADIATION IS DONEPROPHYLACTIC RADIATION IS DONE
B/C OE HIGH INCIDENCE OF OCCULTB/C OE HIGH INCIDENCE OF OCCULT
METASTASIS (40%).METASTASIS (40%).
CHEMOTHERAPYCHEMOTHERAPY
 USED IN PALLIATION IN ADVDNCEDUSED IN PALLIATION IN ADVDNCED
CA.CA.
 AGENTS ARE MTx,5-FU,CISPLATINAGENTS ARE MTx,5-FU,CISPLATIN
BLEOMYCIN.BLEOMYCIN.
 COMBINED CT IS MORE EFFECTIVECOMBINED CT IS MORE EFFECTIVE
THAN SINGLE AGENT.THAN SINGLE AGENT.
 RESPONSE TO CISPLATIN+5FURESPONSE TO CISPLATIN+5FU
OCCURE IN TWO THIRDS OF PtOCCURE IN TWO THIRDS OF Pt
WITH COMPLETE RESPONSE IN 5-WITH COMPLETE RESPONSE IN 5-
15%15%
TREATMENT OF NECKTREATMENT OF NECK
 DEPEND ON NODAL STATUS.DEPEND ON NODAL STATUS.
 RND IS GOLD STANDARD.RND IS GOLD STANDARD.
 MRND GIVE BETTER COSMETIC &MRND GIVE BETTER COSMETIC &
FUNCTIONAL RESULT.FUNCTIONAL RESULT.
 CLASSIC RND : 5 LEVEL LN WITHCLASSIC RND : 5 LEVEL LN WITH
SAN, IJV, SCM.SAN, IJV, SCM.
 MRND : 5 LEVEL LN WITHMRND : 5 LEVEL LN WITH
PRESERVATION OF THEPRESERVATION OF THE
STRUCTURE.STRUCTURE.
 TYPE-1 PRESERVE SAN.TYPE-1 PRESERVE SAN.
 TYPE-2 PRESERVES AN & IJV.TYPE-2 PRESERVES AN & IJV.
 TYPE-3 PRESERVE SAN IJVTYPE-3 PRESERVE SAN IJV
&SCM.&SCM.
 N-0 NECK S/B TREATED WITHN-0 NECK S/B TREATED WITH
SOHND.SOHND.
 PATHOLOGICALLY POSITIVEPATHOLOGICALLY POSITIVE
NODE DETECTED ON TABLE BYNODE DETECTED ON TABLE BY
FROZEN SECTION S/B TREATEDFROZEN SECTION S/B TREATED
BY RND/MRND.BY RND/MRND.
 IF DECTED AFTER HPEIF DECTED AFTER HPE
FOLLOWING SOHND Pt SHOULDFOLLOWING SOHND Pt SHOULD
UNDER GO RTUNDER GO RT
PROGNOSISPROGNOSIS
 DEPENDS ON NODAL STATUS & DEPTH OFDEPENDS ON NODAL STATUS & DEPTH OF
INVASION PERINEURAL & VASCUALR SPREADINVASION PERINEURAL & VASCUALR SPREAD
STAGE 5 YEARS SURVIVAL
ORAL TONGUE BASE OF TONGUE
I 70% 60%
II 40% 40%
III 25% 30%
IV < 20% 15%
OVERALL SURVIVAL OF TOOUNGE CNANCER IS NEAR 50%.
RECURRENT DISEASERECURRENT DISEASE
 WHEN A PRIMARY RECUR AFTER RT ORWHEN A PRIMARY RECUR AFTER RT OR
SURGERY CRYOSURGERY OR LASERSURGERY CRYOSURGERY OR LASER
VAPORIZATION CAN BE USED FORVAPORIZATION CAN BE USED FOR
PALLIATION.PALLIATION.
TERMINAL EVENTSTERMINAL EVENTS
 CANCER CACHEXIA & STARVATIONSCANCER CACHEXIA & STARVATIONS
 INHALATION BRONCHOPNEUMONIAINHALATION BRONCHOPNEUMONIA
 ASPHYXIA D/T OEDEMA OR PRESSUREASPHYXIA D/T OEDEMA OR PRESSURE
ON AIR PASSAGE FROM A FIXED LNON AIR PASSAGE FROM A FIXED LN
 EROSION OF ICA IN POST 1/3 CANCEREROSION OF ICA IN POST 1/3 CANCER
 EROSION OF LINGUAL ARTRY IN ARTEROSION OF LINGUAL ARTRY IN ART
2/3 CANCER2/3 CANCER
Tongue carcinoma