Skip to main content
INCIDENCE OF POSTERIOR
CAPSULAR
OPACITY AFTER SMALL INCISION
CATARACT
SURGERY IN AGE RELATED
CATARACT AND
THE RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED
WITH IT
INTRODUCTION
 Posterior capsular opacification (PCO) is one of
the most common late complications of
extracapsular cataract extraction
 Major cause of decreased vision after uneventful
cataract surgery
 More threatening in young adults and children,
with a higher incidence, quicker onset and
greater amblyogenic effect
INTRODUCTION
 Vision impairment caused by PCO has become
one of the major reasons for patients'
postsurgical dissatisfaction and major ocular
morbidity
 It represents significant financial burden to
health care system
 With limited specialty service available and
difficulty in follow up, measures should be taken
in prevention of PCO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
General objectives
 To find out the incidence of posterior capsular
opacification after small incision cataract surgery
in age related cataract
Specific objectives
 To find out the demographic profile of patients
with PCO
 To find out type of cataract associated with PCO
formation
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
Specific objectives:
 To compare PCO in relation with type of
capsulotomy
- continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis
- envelop technique
 To compare PCO in relation with
hydrodelineation
 To grade PCO after SICS in Madurai grading
system
METHODOLOGY
 Study Design: Prospective observational cohort
study
 Place of study: Department of Ophthalmology,
BPKIHS, Dharan
 Sample size: 125 consecutive eyes with age
related cataract undergone small incision cataract
surgery
Calculation of sample size: n = z2Ă—pĂ—qĂ· l2
Where n = sample size
z = 1.96 at 95% confidence interval Ě´ 2
p = 15(expected result)
l = 20% of p = 3
q = 85
Applying above formula n =560
According to CDC (WHO): CSS = calculated sample size
1 + calculated sample size Ă·
exp. population
Sample size = 112 + 10% = 125 eyes
*all the samples will be included in the study.
METHODOLOGY
 Period of study: one year
 Follow up: 1 week, 4 week, 12 week and 6
month postoperative
 Inclusion criteria: All the patients with age
related cataract (more than 40 years)
underwent small incision cataract surgery at
BPKIHS
METHODOLOGY
Exclusion criteria:
 Age < 40 years
 The patients undergone ICCE
 Patients with anterior chamber intraocular lens
 Posterior capsule rupture intraoperatively
 Patient not giving consent
 Patient lost to follow up
 PCO present intraoperatively
 Patients undergone phacoemulsification
RESULTS
 All the calculations were done after completion
of 6 months postoperative follow up
 A total 125 eyes of 119 patients were enrolled
 The mean age of the study population was 67.05
years with SD ±10.56 years
AGE AND GENDER DISTRIBUTION
Age Group
Gender
TotalMale
No (%)
Female
No (%)
≥40-50 years
4 5 9
(6.6%) (7.8%) (7.2%)
51-60 years
12 8 20
(19.7%) (12.5%) (16.0%)
61-70 years
27 22 49
(44.3%) (34.4%) (39.2%)
71-80 years
12 21 33
(19.7%) (32.8%) (26.4%)
>80 years
6 8 14
(9.8%) (12.5%) (11.2%)
Total
61 64 125
(100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%)
DISTRIBUTION OF GENDER
n=64, 51.2%
n=61, 48.8%
female male
HYDRODELINEATION
72.80%
27.20%
Done Not done
n=34
n=91
CAPSULORRHEXIS
64.80%
35.20%
n=81
n=44
CCC Envelope
INCIDENCE OF PCO AFTER 6 MONTH OF
CATARACT SURGERY
29.60%
70.40%
n-37
n-88
PCO
Presence of PCO Absence of PCO
GRADE OF POSTERIOR CAPSULE OPACIFICATION
AT 6 MONTH OF CATARACT SURGERY
Grades of PCO Frequency (n) Percent (%)
Grade 0 88 70.4
Grade 1 18 14.4
Grade 2 17 13.6
Grade 3 2 1.6
Total 125 100.0
GRADE OF PCO AND TYPES OF CATARACT
Type of cataract
Grade of PCO
% of PCO in types of
cataract
P value
Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3
NS
11 3 2 0 31.25%
0.241
PSCC
13 0 2 0 13.33%
MSC
8 3 5 1 52.94%
NS+PSCC
29 9 7 0 35.56%
NS+ PSCC+ Cortical
6 0 1 0 14.29%
PSCC+ Cortical
21 3 0 1 16%
Total 88 18 17 2
125
SYSTEMIC DISEASE AND PCO
Systemic
disease
Number of
cases
Number of
cases with PCO
(percentage)
P value
Diabetes 38 14 (36.84%) 0.241
Hypertension 49 18(36.73%) 0.161
Atopic
dermatitis
1 0(0%) 1.000*
Arthritis 3 0(0%) 0.554*
COPD 5 2(40%) 0.632*
Thyroid disease 1 0(0%) 1.000*
Heart disease 1 1(100%) 0.396*
TYPE OF CAPSULOTOMY AND PCO
PCO Type of capsulotomy Total P value
CCC Envelope
Yes
18 19 37
0.014
22.2% 43.2% 29.6%
No
63 25 88
77.8% 56.8% 70.4%
Total
81 44 125
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
PCO AND HYDRODELINEATION
PCO
Hydrodelineation
Total
P value
done not done
Yes
20 17 37
0.020
22.0% 50.0% 29.6%
No
71 17 88
78.0% 50.0% 70.4%
Total
91 34 125
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
PCO AND POSITION OF IOL
PCO
position of IOL
Total P Value
Sulcus in the bag
Yes 3 34 37
0.262
50.0% 28.6% 29.6%
No 3 85 88
50.0% 71.4% 70.4%
Total 6 119 125
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
12
7
4
3
1
Corneal edema
Uveitis after 1
week
Hyphaema
iridodialysis
Raised IOP
(postoperative)
INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE
COMPLICATION AND PCO
Complication
s
PCO
Total P ValueYes NO
Uveitis
5
2 7 0.024
Corneal
edema
4 8 12 0.766
Hyphaema 3 1 4 0.077
Iridodialysis 3 0 3 0.024
Rise in IOP 1 0 1 0.296
DISCUSSION
 The overall incidence of PCO was 29.4% at 6
months of follow up which is comparable to a study
done by Debra et al (28% at 5 years after surgery )
 Clinical grading of posterior capsular opacification
was done at 6 month follow up visits in a study
done in 2005 in outreach microsurgical eye clinic in
Nepal, 46% of cases after manual SICS were found
to develop PCO of some degree
DISCUSSION
 The occurrence of PCO was significantly less in
patients who had CCC capsulotomy compared to
envelop technique (p= 0.014) similar to a study by
Aminollah Nikeghbali ( p < 0.005)
 Similarly Okihiro Nishi emphasizes that CCC can
contribute to reduce PCO
DISCUSSION
 In our study the occurrence PCO was significantly
less in group undergoing hydrodelineation (22%) as
compared to group in whom no hydrodelineation
done (50%) with p value 0.02
 Similar to our study, study done by Vasavada et al
showed PCO was significantly lower in eyes that
had multiquadrant cortical hydrodissection than in
those in whom multiquadrant cortical cleaving
hydrodissection not done
DISCUSSION
 In our study, the incidence of PCO is more with
PCIOL in ciliary sulcus (50%) than PCIOL in the
bag (28.6%) (p value =0.36)
 Vilhjalmsson et al found that the incidence of
capsular opacification was 20% in eyes with sulcus
fixation as opposed to 14% for those with capsular
bag fixation
DISCUSSION
 There were few intraoperative complications in our
study where three cases had iridodialysis, twelve
cases of corneal edema, seven cases with uveitis
after 1 week, four cases with hyphaema, three
cases with iridodialysis and one case with
postoperative raise IOP
 Similar to this study done M.Reza Dana et al
showed uveitis associated with increased risk of
PCO
RECOMMENDATION
 Posterior capsular opacity is the second most
common cause of decrease vision after cataract
 can be reduced by performing simple surgical
steps like
- well centered continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis,
- hydrodissection enhanced cortical clean up along
with hydrodelineation, and
- in the bag implantation of the posterior chamber
intraocular lens.
LIMITATIONS
 small sample size
 Short duration of follow up 6 months which is not
enough to have final conclusion on incidence of
PCO because Elschnig's pearl formation may takes
2-5 years to develop after cataract surgery
 Cataract surgeries were conducted by many
surgeons in my study so it was difficult to
standardize the results
LIMITATIONS
 the size of capsulorrhexis diameter was not taken
into account.
 The types of capsulotomy groups, continuous
curvilinear capsulorrhexis and envelope technique
were not equally distributed
 Besides surgical techniques, role of other factors
like intraocular lens materials, and designs in the
formation of posterior capsular opacity could not be
studied due to availability of IOL of only one
material type and single design of IOL
REFERENCES
 Raj S M, Vasavada A R, Kaid Johar S R VVA. Review article.
Nep J OPh. 2009;1(1):43–59.
 Brilliant LB, Pokhrel RP, Grasset NC, Lepkowski JM, Kolstad
A, Hawks W, et al. Epidemiology of blindness in Nepal . Bull
World Heal Organ. 1985;63(2):375–86.
 Mark W. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, causes, morphology
and visual effects of cataract. In: M Yanoff and J S Duker .
Ophthalmology. third ed. Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 503–10.
 Werner Liliana. Secondary cataract. M Yanoff and JS Duker.
Ophthalmology. third ed. 2009. p. 497–502.
 Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Werner L, Maloof AJ, Milverton EJ.
Posterior capsule opacification: a review of the
aetiopathogenesis, experimental and clinical studies and
factors for prevention. Indian J Ophthalmol. Medknow
Publications; 2004;52(2):99–112.
REFERENCES
 Pai S, Kamath S, Kedia V, Shruthi K, Pai A. Cataract surgery in
camp patients: a study on visual outcomes. Nepal J Ophthalmol.
2011 Aug 18;3(2):159–64
 Raj SM, Vasavada AR, Johar SRK, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA.
Post-operative capsular opacification: a review. Int J Biomed Sci.
2007 Dec;3(4):237–50
 Ebihara Y, Kato S, Oshika T, Yoshizaki M, Sugita G. Posterior
capsule opacification after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes
mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jul;32(7):1184–7
 Vasavada AR, Dholakia SA, Raj SM, Singh R. Effect of
cortical cleaving hydrodissection on posterior capsule
opacification in age-related nuclear cataract. J Cataract
Refract Surg. Elsevier; 2006 Jul 1;32(7):1196–200
REFERENCES
 Vilhjalmsson GA, Lucas BC. [Incidence of secondary cataract in
sulcus versus capsular bag fixation of posterior chamber lenses. Klin
Monbl Augenheilkd. 1992 Mar;200(3):167–70
 Dana MR, Chatzistefanou K, Schaumberg DA, Foster CS. Posterior
Capsule Opacification after Cataract Surgery in Patients with
Uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1997 Sep;104(9):1387–94.
THANK YOU