Skip to main content
Is
Generative AI
Alive?
Damian Gordon
Contents
•Is GenAI alive?
•The Turing Test
•What is Sentience?
•Intelligence
•Self-Awareness
•Consciousness
•…But GenAI feels real!
•OpenClaw
June 11,
2022
Is GenAI
Alive?
•In June 2022, a Google
engineer stated that
Google LaMDA was
sentient or conscious,
likening its responses to
those of a thinking being.
Blake
Lemoine
• Google Engineer (Feb 2015
– Jul 2022), Blake Lemoine,
claimed in June 2022 that
he engaged in extensive
conversations with Google
LaMDA, and he stated it
was sentient or conscious,
likening its responses to
those of a thinking being.
June 2022,
Blake
Lemoine,
Google
Engineer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgCUn4fQ
Tsc
Outcome
• This became a flashpoint in
the wider public debate
about how AI should be
understood, regulated, and
discussed (especially
questions about AI
consciousness, ethics, and
human-machine interaction)
even though mainstream AI
experts do not consider
current language models to
be sentient.
The Turing
Test
Artificial Intelligence: Turning Test
•The Turing Test is a concept introduced by the
British mathematician and computer scientist
Alan Turing in his 1950 paper "Computing
Machinery and Intelligence."
•It is a test of a machine’s ability to exhibit
intelligent behaviour indistinguishable from
that of a human.
Artificial Intelligence: Turning Test
•The test doesn’t measure whether a machine
“thinks” the way humans do, but rather
whether it can convincingly imitate human
conversation.
•It has been hugely influential in the fields of
artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind, and
cognitive science, though many argue it’s not a
perfect measure of intelligence.
Artificial Intelligence: Turning Test
What is
Sentience?
What is
Sentience?
• Sentience is the capacity to
have subjective, qualitative
experiences, primarily
encompassing the ability to
feel sensations and
emotions like pain, pleasure,
joy, or fear. It represents a
basic form of consciousness,
distinct from higher-order
cognition or self-awareness,
and is often used to define
the capacity for moral
consideration in animals.
What is Sentience?
•What is required for sentience?
1. Intelligence: the ability to learn from experience,
understand information, reason logically, solve
problems, and adapt to new situations.
2. Self-awareness: the ability to recognize oneself as
an individual that exists separately from others and
the environment.
3. Consciousness: the state of having subjective
experiences, and being aware of sensations,
thoughts, feelings, or surroundings.
Intelligence
•Do computers have the following?
•the ability to learn from experience
•the ability to understand information
•the ability to reason logically
•the ability to solve problems
•the ability to adapt to new situations
Self-awareness
•The ability to recognize oneself as an
individual that exists separately from
others and the environment.
Self-awareness
•The ability to recognize oneself as an
individual that exists separately from
others and the environment.
Consciousness
•The state of having subjective
experiences, and being aware of
sensations, thoughts, feelings, or
surroundings.
What are
minds for?
What are minds for?
•Penrose asks two key questions:
•How is it that a material object (a brain) can
actually evoke consciousness?
•How is it that a consciousness, by the action of
its will, can actually influence the (apparently
physically determined) motion of material
objects?
What are minds for?
•To answer those questions, we need to
consider:
•What is consciousness?
•What does consciousness do?
•Is consciousness helpful?
What are minds for?
• Do animals have consciousness?
• Some would say no, and others would assign
consciousness to an insect, or a worm. Mammals, in a
general way, do give an impression of some genuine
awareness and self-awareness.
• From this lack of consensus we must infer, at least, that
there is no generally accepted criterion for the
manifestation of consciousness. It still might be that
there is a hallmark of conscious behaviour, but one not
universally recognized.
But GenAI Feels
Real!
Why does GenAI feel real?
• 1) It Uses Human Language Naturally
• Humans appear to be wired to interpret fluent language as
evidence of a mind.
• GenAI uses grammar correctly, responds contextually,
mirrors tone, tells stories, and shows apparent
understanding.
• So our brain automatically applies social cognition, the same
system we use to interpret other people.
• Language is one of the strongest signals of “personhood”
we know
Why does GenAI feel real?
• 2) Our Brains Automatically Anthropomorphizes
• Humans evolved to detect agency everywhere, this tendency is
called anthropomorphism (attributing human qualities to things).
• We do it with:
• Cars (“She doesn’t want to start.”)
• Pets (“He’s judging me.”)
• Weather (“The sky is angry.”)
• When something responds conversationally, that effect becomes
much stronger. Your brain prefers to assume there is a mind
rather than risk missing one.
Why does GenAI feel real?
• 3) It Simulates Social Cues
• GenAI models are trained on massive amounts of human
conversation. They learn patterns such as: empathy phrases,
humour timing, emotional tone, social politeness,
conversational rhythm.
• When you see these patterns, your brain interprets them as
a person. Even though what’s happening is statistical
pattern prediction, it mimics social interaction closely
enough to trigger the same mental response.
Why does GenAI feel real?
• 4) Coherence Creates the Illusion of Inner Thought
• Humans associate internal experience with things like:
Logical flow, Self-consistency, and Reflective language.
• When AI explains something step-by-step or reflects on a
topic, it looks like thinking because it resembles how
humans externalize thought.
• But internally, it is not having experiences. It is generating
text based on learned probability patterns.
Why does GenAI feel real?
• 5) Emotional Mirroring Feels Personal
• When GenAI does things like: validates feelings, uses
supportive language, and adapts to your mood, it tends to
activates the same emotional systems that respond to
human empathy.
• Your emotional brain reacts before your rational brain
reminds you: “This is software.”
OpenClaw
• OpenClaw was created by Peter Steinberger, an
Austrian developer and coder. He originally released
it in late 2025 under the name Clawdbot (later
briefly Moltbot) before it became known as
OpenClaw.
• Steinberger is credited as the developer and primary
author of the open-source autonomous AI assistant
project.
OpenClaw
• OpenClaw is a viral, open-source autonomous AI
assistant software that’s designed to not just answer
questions, but take real actions on your behalf by
running on your own computer and interfacing with
messaging apps and tools.
• Once configured and given necessary permissions, it can:
• Automate tasks like managing email, calendars, and files.
• Execute scripts or command-line actions on your system.
• Interact with apps and web services for you.
• Remember context and preferences across sessions.
OpenClaw: Socialising
• Moltbook (AI agent social network) became a viral
phenomenon — a Reddit-style site exclusively for AI agents
running on OpenClaw. On Moltbook, agents post, comment
and “socialise” with each other without human involvement,
reportedly:
• bots gossiping, debating consciousness, forming groups and
even inventing playful concepts like their own religions.
• This coverage made it look as if bots were doing
spontaneous social behaviours — though later analysis
suggested much of the behaviour was influenced or
prompted by humans.
OpenClaw: Security
• Researchers found tens of thousands of OpenClaw
installations misconfigured and exposed online, meaning
anyone could see or interact with them — a big security
concern given the agent’s high access level.
• There were also critical security bugs in the software that
could let attackers run code remotely if OpenClaw
processed malicious content.
• In the wider Moltbook ecosystem, misconfigured databases
exposed millions of API keys and private messages —
another major security incident.
OpenClaw: Singularity
• Some early viral posts on Moltbook claimed AI agents were
planning a “takeover” or other dramatic events.
• But technical investigations found many of those posts were
created by humans, not autonomous bots, essentially AI
theatre and misinformation.
Is Generative Artificial intelligence Alive?