Skip to main content
Information Assurance/Information Security
John W. Lainhart IV
presentation for the
Computer System Security and Privacy Advisory Meeting
June 13, 2002
p c
P w C
A business of
2 p c
Agenda
• Information Assurance
• COBIT & the Management Guidelines
• IT Governance
• SysTrustSM Assurance Service
• Managing Security of Information
• Board Briefing on IT Governance
• Information Security Governance
• Center for Internet Security Benchmarks
Information Assurance
p c
3
4 p c
Information Assurance
Conducting those
Conducting those operations that protect
that protect
and defend information and information
and defend information and information
systems by ensuring
systems by ensuring confidentiality,
,
integrity,
, availability and
and accountability.
.
This includes providing for
This includes providing for restoration of
of
information systems by incorporating
information systems by incorporating
protection,
, detection and
and reaction
capabilities.
capabilities.
NIAP Definition
5 p c
Strategic Vision: Holistic Understanding
Security is a Function of Business
Successful Implementation of Any
Sensitive Security Program Requires
An Understanding of the Mission,
Operations, Resources, and the
Business Impact Caused by Vulnerabilities
Implement Control Protective Measures
to Mitigate Exploitable Risks and
Minimize Operational Impacts Caused
by Physical And IT Vulnerabilities…
Threats Will Continue to Exist…
Traditional Security Must be Integrated
And Active for OPSEC and Business
Continuity to be Effective
Architecture
Services
6 p c
IA: A Functional Spectrum
IA Program Objectives: Moving Beyond Information Security
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Accountability
Successful
programs contain
both
proactive and reactive
functions to be effective.
Proactive Measures Event Reactive Functions
Protect Detect React
Policies Procedures
Intrusion Detection Firewall Management
Password Management Configuration
Biometrics Management
Encryption Threat Analysis
Vulnerability Assessment Risk Analysis
Training & Education Document Control
Classification Smart Cards
Management C&A (NIACAP, DITSCAP)
SW Patches Anti-Virus
Data Storage Contingency Plans
Personnel Security Physical Security
Counter Competitor Intelligence
Penetration Testing
Networks
Social Engineering
Open Source Exploitation
CIRT (CERT)
COOP Investigations
Disaster Recovery Computer Forensics
Continuity of Government Business Continuity
Incident Reporting Process Network Scty Intell
Business
Environment
Monitoring
Managed
Security
Services
(Examples)
p c
6
7 p c
Concentric Barriers: Rings of Security
Protecting Critical Assets in the Virtual World Mirrors the Physical
Monitoring
CIRT
Forensics
BCP/COOP
Proactive Measures Event Reactive Functions
Protect Detect React
Deter
e.g. Warning Banner
Detect
e.g. Intrusion Detection
Delay
e.g. Firewall
Defend
e.g Encryption
Deny
e.g. Honey Pots
Defeat
e.g. Arrest
Defense in Depth Escalation by Severity
Critical Data
&
Essential
Information
(Examples)
p c
7
8 p c
PDD 63
PDD 63 responds to the Interdependence of Infrastructures and Technologies
Telecommunications
Power
Gas/Oil
Finance/Banking
Transportation
Water
Government Services
Emergency Services
What the Public Sees/Reads
Determines their Confidence
What the Public Does Not See
Involves Detailed Integration
Of the Infrastructure:
Plans/Compliance/Actions
p c
What We Can Do:
•Threat Analysis
•Vulnerability Studies
•Protective Measures
•Impact Analysis
8
9 p c
Information Assurance Program
Management
Services
Information Assurance Program
Develop a cross functional (technical, physical,
personnel and environmental) matrix team
consisting of empowered management and staff
who are tasked to develop and manage long-term
strategic direction for the organization
Information Assurance Program incorporating:
- Security Vision & Strategy
- Senior Management Commitment
- Training & Awareness Programs
- Information Assurance Management
Structure
Chair
CIO
Co-Chair
PM Secretariat
Working Groups
Technical Management Operations Policy Personnel
Individual Stand Up
As-Necessary
- Steering Committee
Public
Relations
Technical Sub Agencies
Org.
Security
Operations
H
R
Budget
- Members at large
Sub Agency I
Sub Agency III
Sub Agency I
Sub Agency IV
10 p c
Information Assurance Program
Assessment and Diagnostic Service
• Risk Assessment (incorporating Asset
Inventory, Mission Requirements Driven
Policy, Threats, Vulnerabilities, associated
Risk, Countermeasures, ROI, and strategic
action implementation plan)
• Penetration Testing and Analysis
• Financial (budget) Assessment
• Diagnostics Security Reviews of specific
platforms
• Asset Inventory Analysis
• Security Readiness Reviews
• Security Testing and Evaluation
(documentation, testing and Evaluation)
• Government Information Security Reform Act
(GISRA) Review
• Critical Infrastructure Protection Analysis
• Certification and Accreditation
(System Security Authorization Agreement)
• Data/Information Integrity Assessment
• Site Surveys and Analysis
• Tools (i.e., EMM@, ESAS, Buddy System)
11 p c
Information Assurance Program
Management Services
• Policy Development
• Technical Writing
• Standards
• Management Infrastructure
• Education Training and Awareness
• Business & Technical Disaster
Recovery (documentation, training and
testing)
• Management Training
• Continuity Of Operations (COOP)
Development
• Capacity Management
• Configuration Management
• IAP Metrics
• Knowledge Management
• Distance Learning
• Strategic Management Consulting
• Economic Security
12 p c
Information Assurance Program
Architecture Services
• Enterprise-Wide Architecture
• Network Security architecture and
Specialized Architectures
• Security Product Review & Analysis
• Security Program Review & Analysis
• Life Cycle Methodology Development
• Configuration
• Security Architecture and Design
Architecture
Services
13 p c
Information Assurance Program
Implementation Services
• Commercial security products (COTS)
• Encryption
• Single Sign On
• Firewalls
• Servers
• Routers
• Web/Internet Services
• VPNs
• Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
• Secured Electronic Transaction (SET)
• Digital Certificates
• Certificate Authority Design
• Authentication
• Directory Services
• Smart Cards
• Biometrics
• Wireless
14 p c
Information Assurance Program
Incident Investigation and Assurance
Services
• Investigation and recovery from
computer security incidents
• Data Forensics
• Incident Reporting and response
services
• CERT/NOC capabilities
• Vulnerability Alerts
• Virus Alerts
• Unauthorized intrusion detection
15 p c
Information Assurance Program
How To Get There!
Where You Want To Be!
Where You Are!
Information
Assurance
Program
Recommendations
Current
IT
Program
Building on the strengths of your current Y2K Infrastructure, the next
step is to move to a world class Information Assurance Program.
COBIT
Information Technology Governance Institute
Control Objectives for Information and related
Technology
p c
16
17 p c
COBIT: An IT control framework
XStarts from the premise that IT needs to
deliver the information that the enterprise
needs to achieve its objectives
XPromotes process focus and process
ownership
XDivides IT into 34 processes belonging to
four domains
XLooks at fiduciary, quality and security
needs of enterprises and provides for
seven information criteria that can be used
to generically define what the business
requires from IT
XPlanning
XAcquiring & Implementing
XDelivery & Support
XMonitoring
XEffectiveness
XEfficiency
XAvailability,
XIntegrity
XConfidentiality
XReliability
XCompliance
18 p c
COBIT : An IT control framework
X A high-level control objective for each process
 identifying which information criteria are most
important in that IT process
 stating which resources will usually be leveraged
 providing considerations on what is important for
controlling that IT process
X 318 detailed control objectives for management
and IT practitioners
X Extensive audit guidelines building on these
objectives
19 p c
COBIT Management Guidelines
Answers Key Management Questions
Through the use of:
Maturity Models
Critical Success Factors
Key Goal Indicators
Key Performance Indicators
20 p c
COBIT Management Guidelines
Generic Maturity Model
0 Non-Existent. Complete lack of any recognizable processes. The organization has not even recognized
that there is an issue to be addressed.
1 Initial. There is evidence that the organization has recognized that the issues exist and need to be
addressed. There are however no standardized processes but instead there are ad hoc approaches that tend to
be applied on an individual or case by case basis. The overall approach to management is disorganised.
2 Repeatable. Processes have developed to the stage where similar procedures are followed by different
people undertaking the same task. There is no formal training or communication of standard procedures and
responsibility is left to the individual. There is a high degree of reliance on the knowledge of individuals and
therefore errors are likely.
3 Defined. Procedures have been standardized and documented, and communicated through training. It is
however left to the individual to follow these processes, and it is unlikely that deviations will be detected.
The procedures themselves are not sophisticated but are the formalization of existing practices.
4 Managed. It is possible to monitor and measure compliance with procedures and to take action where
processes appear not to be working effectively. Processes are under constant improvement and provide good
practice. Automation and tools are used in a limited or fragmented way.
5 Optimized. Processes have been refined to a level of best practice, based on the results of continuous
improvement and maturity modeling with other organizations. IT is used in an integrated way to automate
the workflow, providing tools to improve quality and effectiveness, making the enterprise quick to adapt.
p c
20
21 p c
COBIT Management Guidelines
Maturity Models for Self-Assessment
22 p c
IT Governance
PO
AI
DS
MO
SysTrustSM
American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants/Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants
Systems Reliability Assurance Service
p c
23
24 p c
SysTrust
Opinion on controls
– Based on a framework of principles  criteria
– Identify and assess the operating effectiveness of
controls that support the criteria
A system must meet all principles  all criteria to be
considered “Reliable”
– Reporting on less than 4 principles is permitted
– All criteria related to the principle must be met
25 p c
SysTrust
SysTrust as an Assurance Service
SysTrust used to manage internal risk
– New applications being developed and/or implemented
– Applications already in use
SysTrust use to manage 3rd party risk
Partner systems
– 3rd party service-bureau systems
– Online marketplaces/exchanges
26 p c
SysTrust
SysTrust as Consulting Engagement
SysTrust is a benchmark on controls
Opportunity to identify control weaknesses
Current engagements started as consulting
Greater market for Consulting or Assurance?
27 p c
SysTrust
System reliability is defined as:
“A system that operates without material error,
fault or failure during a specified time in a
specified environment.”
Four Principles:
- Availability - Security
- Integrity - Maintainability
Managing Security of Information
International Federation of Accountants
International Information Technology Guideline
p c
28
29 p c
Managing Security of Information
Core Principles
Accountability - Responsibility and accountability must
be explicit
Awareness - Awareness of risks and security initiatives
must be disseminated
Multidisciplinary - Security must be addressed taking into
consideration both technological and non-technological
issues
Cost Effectiveness - Security must be cost-effective
30 p c
Managing Security of Information
Core Principles
Integration - Security must be coordinated and integrated
Reassessment - Security must be reassessed periodically
Timeliness - Security procedures must provide for monitoring
and timely response
Societal Factors - Ethics must be promoted by respecting the
rights and interests of others
31 p c
Managing Security of Information
Implementation Approach
Policy Development
Roles and Responsibilities
Design
Implementation
Monitoring
Awareness, Training, and Education
INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY STATEMENT EXAMPLE
Board Briefing on Information Technology Governance
Information Security Governance
Co-Badged by a Number of Leading
Organizations
p c
32
33 p c
Information Technology Governance
“IT governance is the term used to describe how those
persons entrusted with governance of an entity will
consider IT in their supervision, monitoring, control
and direction of the entity. How IT is applied within
the entity will have an immense impact on whether
the entity will attain its vision, mission or strategic
goals.”
ITGI document: Board Briefing on Information Technology Governance
34 p c
Information Security Governance
“Executive management has a responsibility to
ensure that the organization provides all users
with a secure information systems
environment. Furthermore, organizations need
to protect themselves against the risks inherent
in the use of information systems while
simultaneously recognising the benefits that
can accrue from having secure information
systems.”
ITGI document: Information Security Governance
Center for Internet Security
p c
35
36 p c
Center for Internet Security
is developing:
• best-practice benchmarks that define the specific
technical settings that will provide increased
security for Internet-connected systems
• a security ruler that defines which of those specific
settings will increase the relative security of your
systems
• automated tools to continuously monitor the
security status of your systems
37 p c
Web Sites
• COBIT -- www.itgi.org
• SysTrustSM -- www.aicpa.org
• Managing Security of Information -- www.ifac.org
• Board Briefing on Information Technology
Governance -- www.itgi.org
• Information Security Governance – www.itgi.org
• Center for Internet Security – www.cisecurity.org
QUESTIONS?
QUESTIONS?
p c
38
Contact Information:
Contact Information:
John W. Lainhart IV
703/741-1647
john.w.lainhart@us.pwcglobal.com
p c
39