Skip to main content
Class 12.2
Making
Multiples II:
Photography
A r t 1 0 0
U n d e r s t a n d i n g V i s u a l C u l t u r e
Diane ARBUS, Crying Child, New Jersey, 1967
Photography seems like an
inevitable fact of modern life.
But, where did it come from?
When and how did it actually
arise?
The original “camera” was as
big as a nice walk-in closet!
Origins of the “camera”
These diagrams are two early depictions of the workings of the
“camera obscura” (meaning "dark room”), in which an external image
enters a darkened chamber through a pinhole opening and appears
upside down on the opposite wall. The resulting image can be traced.
It's essentially a very elaborate "drawing aid."
Slowly the camera
obscura gets smaller
and more portable.
Here it has
contracted to the size
of a small cabinet
with legs.
Gradually it shrinks to a tabletop apparatus, and finally, to the size of a small box.
The origins of
the “camera”
With the room-size camera obscura now contracted into a small box, the
pinhole replaced with a lens that permits focusing, and a mirror installed to
reverse the image, all that remains is to find a way of making the reflected
image permanent.
The physics and optics of the
camera are put together first,
but the chemistry remains to
be cracked.
As often happens in the history of technology, multiple
competing solutions appear at more or less the same
time.
It turns out that a number of alternative chemical
solutions to the problem are developed.
Use these links to see some of the possibilities that
were explored by early photographers:
http://photographymuseum.org/primer.html
http://www.edinphoto.org.uk/1_early/1_early_photogr
aphy_-_processes.htm
Today some photographers still enjoy
experimenting with different techniques from
the 19th century.
http://www.alternativephotography.com/wp/
processes
A "how to" for some of these techniques
is available at this link.
There are many competitors for best method, but two
processes become dominant in the 19th century.
The dominant technology in France is invented by Joseph
Nièpce (NEE-eps) in conjunction with Daguerre (DAH-
gair).
Joseph Nicéphore Nièpce,
View from the Window at Le Gras, c. 1826, heliograph
“the first photograph”
Joseph Nicéphore Nièpce
View from the Window at Le Gras, c. 1826, sketch by
Helmut Gernsheim
Joseph Nicéphore Nièpce
View from the Window at Le Gras, 1826, 1952 print
http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/exhibit
ions/permanent/wfp/
LEARN MORE about the "first photograph"
equipment needed for “daguerreotype” process
early daguerreotypes
View of San Francisco,
1848
• tend to be quite small
• produce a sharply
detailed image
• they produce a single,
"positive" image (not
multiple prints from a
negative)
• also known as
"tintypes" because the
image imprints on a
metal plate
Portrait of
Edgar Allan Poe, 1848
Note the decorative
leather case, which is
typical of how early
daguerreotypes were
presented.
early daguerreotypes
The Barton family dog, Nero, 1848
Group of 10 unidentified boys,
Date unknown
"calotype"
In England, a competing process was invented by William
Henry Fox Talbot. He called his process the “calotype.”
It was rather different as it was a negative process, capable
of generating multiple prints on paper.
The image produced has a soft, "faded" quality.
Talbot published a beautiful folio
of his photographs in 1844 to
promote his new invention. He
called photography the "Pencil of
Nature" and thought of it as
nature writing its own image in
light.
Talbot, Bust of Patroclus, 1839
Talbot, Articles of Glass, 1839
Talbot, Books in a
Library, 1839
Talbot, The Haystack 1839
Photography began as a plaything of
the rich but quickly entrepreneurs
and inventors sought to make it
widely available.
Nadar
Gaspard Félix Tournachon, “Nadar”
Entrepreneurs quickly got
hold of the new technology
and figured out how to
create businesses around
it.
Nadar’s studio opened a
deluxe photography
studio at 35 boulevard
des Capucines, Paris.
As you can see, there is
ample plate glass to
allow natural light into
several floors of photo
studios.
He plasters his name
across the front of the
studio. (see arrow)
Nadar created an elegant studio
where the elites of the day would feel
comfortable enduring the long pose times
needed for a photograph.
Nadar,
Portrait of Sarah Bernhardt, c. 1865
Sarah Bernhardt was a
famous dramatic actress of the day.
She was among the many
celebrities in French culture who
posed for Nadar. Anyone who could
afford it rushed to have their portrait
done.
Disdéri, Portrait of Rosa Bonheur, c. 1871
Artists, poets, intellectuals, writers
and politicians all had
photographs made, as well as
ballerinas and actresses, and the
nobility.
Disdéri, unidentified Ballerina, uncut
sheet of carte-de-visite photographs
A competitor, Disdéri,
invented a popular format
called the "carte-
de-visite." This was a
sheet of photos
that could be cut up and
left as visiting
cards when people made
their social calls
upon each other.
Disdéri, uncut sheet of cartes-
de visite
Queen Victoria in carte-de-visite format
Disdéri, Self Portrait
The days of a handheld camera that
anyone can use are still in the
future!
For now, the photographer has a
unique set of skills.
Daumier, “Nadar, elevating
the status of photography
to an art,” May 1862
In this cartoon, artist and
illustrator Daumier teases
Nadar, suggesting he will
never be able to "elevate"
photography to a fine art,
unless he goes up in a hot-
air balloon (another state of
the art technology at the
time.)
Èdouard MANET
Corner of a Café-Concert
1878-1879
National Gallery, London
oil on canvas
38.4 × 30.5 inches
So back to the world of
painted representations.
How does this new
technology for making
likenesses impact the
traditional art form of
painting?
There isn't a simple answer.
In fact, the artworld
continues to address the
impact of new technologies,
like photography, film, video,
and the internet. It is not a
settled question (it continues
to be productive within the
artworld).
But let's point to one impact
that can be felt right away.
Claude MONET
Garden at Sainte-
Adresse, 1867
oil on canvas
38 5/8 x 51 1/8 in
The Impressionists signaled a major change, as you can see here. They are like a
breath of fresh air into the art world, which in this picture takes the literal form of the
crisp seaside breeze that the well-dressed tourists are enjoying on summer vacation.
We are in the modern world now, bright, light, and always changing, as quickly as the
weather does.
Claude MONET, Impression: Sunrise, 1872
The Impressionists also become interested in capturing atmospheric effects, like dawn
and twilight, and all types of different weather conditions. Now that photography can
capture the literal appearance of things, artists are freer to experiment.
Claude MONET
The Saint-Lazare Station
1877
Oil on canvas
H. 75; W. 104 cm
Claude MONET
The Saint-Lazare Station
1877
Oil on canvas
H. 75; W. 104 cm
If we want to document the precise appearance of this train station, we can make
a photograph (and there are many photographs of urban Paris at this time). However,
if we want to feel some of the hectic quality of the train station, the crowds, and clouds
of smoke, we might turn to Monet’s picture instead.
J.M.W. Turner
Rain, Steam and Speed,
1844 oil on canvas
36 × 48 inches
National Gallery, London
J.M.W. TURNER
Rain, Steam and
Speed, 1844 oil on
canvas
36 × 48 inches
National Gallery,
London
Working in England at an even earlier date, Turner also becomes
interested in the look and feel of various forms of weather, to the
point that portions of his canvases
verge on abstraction.
J.M.W. Turner, The Burning of the Houses of Parliament, 1835
J.M.W. Turner, The Burning of the Houses of Parliament, 1835
Here Turner renders the giant fire that consumed the British Parliament in
dramatic oranges. The buildings themselves are barely visible among the flames.
James Abbott MacNeill WHISTLER
(American, living in London)
Nocturne in Black and Gold: The
Falling Rocket
1875
Whistler’s paintings push even
farther into gorgeous abstractions
full of color and texture that entice
the eye while scarcely resolving into
a recognizable picture.
Claude MONET, Waterlilies, c. 1920, MoMA, NYC
Monet’s late pictures of waterlilies floating on the pond in his garden push toward
abstract painting as well.