Skip to content

Conversation

@taliastocks
Copy link

@taliastocks taliastocks commented Mar 14, 2025

Attempt to fix #2424, which has been marked as a duplicate of #860 (does not fix all of the latter).

Attempt to fix pre-commit#2424, which has incorrectly been marked as a duplicate of pre-commit#860
@taliastocks
Copy link
Author

Happy to fix/add tests if the approach seems reasonable

@asottile
Copy link
Member

"incorrectly marked as a duplicate" you're really not starting strong with trying to convince me to take your patch. please don't tell me how to run my project

@taliastocks
Copy link
Author

"incorrectly marked as a duplicate" you're really not starting strong with trying to convince me to take your patch. please don't tell me how to run my project

My apologies. I appreciate your efforts, and we chose to use this project because of them.

@jdarpinian
Copy link

This is a good change, it fixes a real issue. I tested it locally and it works for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better support for diff calculation for rebase workflow

3 participants