fix(core): Reattached views that are dirty from a signal update should refresh#53001
Closed
atscott wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Closed
fix(core): Reattached views that are dirty from a signal update should refresh#53001atscott wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
atscott wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Conversation
…d refresh Related to angular#52928 but `updateAncestorTraversalFlagsOnAttach` is called on view insertion and _should_ have made that work for views dirty from signals but it wasn't updated to read the `dirty` flag when we changed it from sharing the `RefreshView` flag. For angular#52928, we've traditionally worked under the assumption that this is working as expected. The created view is `CheckAlways`. There is a question of whether we should automatically mark things for check when the attached view has the `Dirty` flag and/or has the `FirstLViewPass` flag set (or other flags that indicate it definitely needs to be prefreshed).
2299bcb to
dff9730
Compare
AndrewKushnir
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2023
Contributor
|
This PR was merged into the repository by commit b35c673. |
AndrewKushnir
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
…d refresh (#53001) Related to #52928 but `updateAncestorTraversalFlagsOnAttach` is called on view insertion and _should_ have made that work for views dirty from signals but it wasn't updated to read the `dirty` flag when we changed it from sharing the `RefreshView` flag. For #52928, we've traditionally worked under the assumption that this is working as expected. The created view is `CheckAlways`. There is a question of whether we should automatically mark things for check when the attached view has the `Dirty` flag and/or has the `FirstLViewPass` flag set (or other flags that indicate it definitely needs to be prefreshed). PR Close #53001
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
ChellappanRajan
pushed a commit
to ChellappanRajan/angular
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2024
…d refresh (angular#53001) Related to angular#52928 but `updateAncestorTraversalFlagsOnAttach` is called on view insertion and _should_ have made that work for views dirty from signals but it wasn't updated to read the `dirty` flag when we changed it from sharing the `RefreshView` flag. For angular#52928, we've traditionally worked under the assumption that this is working as expected. The created view is `CheckAlways`. There is a question of whether we should automatically mark things for check when the attached view has the `Dirty` flag and/or has the `FirstLViewPass` flag set (or other flags that indicate it definitely needs to be prefreshed). PR Close angular#53001
rlmestre
pushed a commit
to rlmestre/angular
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
…d refresh (angular#53001) Related to angular#52928 but `updateAncestorTraversalFlagsOnAttach` is called on view insertion and _should_ have made that work for views dirty from signals but it wasn't updated to read the `dirty` flag when we changed it from sharing the `RefreshView` flag. For angular#52928, we've traditionally worked under the assumption that this is working as expected. The created view is `CheckAlways`. There is a question of whether we should automatically mark things for check when the attached view has the `Dirty` flag and/or has the `FirstLViewPass` flag set (or other flags that indicate it definitely needs to be prefreshed). PR Close angular#53001
amilamen
pushed a commit
to amilamen/angular
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
…d refresh (angular#53001) Related to angular#52928 but `updateAncestorTraversalFlagsOnAttach` is called on view insertion and _should_ have made that work for views dirty from signals but it wasn't updated to read the `dirty` flag when we changed it from sharing the `RefreshView` flag. For angular#52928, we've traditionally worked under the assumption that this is working as expected. The created view is `CheckAlways`. There is a question of whether we should automatically mark things for check when the attached view has the `Dirty` flag and/or has the `FirstLViewPass` flag set (or other flags that indicate it definitely needs to be prefreshed). PR Close angular#53001
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #52928 but
updateAncestorTraversalFlagsOnAttachis called on view insertion and should have made that work for views dirty from signals but it wasn't updated to read thedirtyflag when we changed it from sharing theRefreshViewflag.For #52928, we've traditionally worked under the assumption that this is working as expected. The created view is
CheckAlways. There is a question of whether we should automatically mark things for check when the attached view has theDirtyflag and/or has theFirstLViewPassflag set (or other flags that indicate it definitely needs to be refreshed).