Android - Refactor AvaloniaInputConnection#16490
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
You can test this PR using the following package version. |
emmauss
force-pushed
the
android-input-connection-refactor
branch
from
July 29, 2024 08:31
c2d1072 to
df5e9e4
Compare
|
You can test this PR using the following package version. |
Gillibald
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
maxkatz6
added this pull request to the merge queue
Aug 1, 2024
maxkatz6
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request
Aug 1, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does the pull request do?
Rewrite parts of AndroidInputConnection to respond to android input more accurately. This implementation is based on compose's InputConnection implementation.
What is the current behavior?
Our current implementation is compatible with GBoard due to its low use of composition apis. But not with some other keyboards, like SwiftKey, that makes extensive use of text composition and prediction. As such, words were being skipped or misplaced in those keyboards.
What is the updated/expected behavior with this PR?
A command queue is now being used to batch ime edits. Each command corresponds to an ime action that would affect the text buffer, like composition, commit, and selection updates. If a batch edit is active(common for composition keyboard like SwiftKey), only when batch edit ends would updates be run on the buffer.
Commands that are run affect the text buffer directly, and updates are forwarded to TextInputMethodClient immediately.
How was the solution implemented (if it's not obvious)?
Checklist
Breaking changes
Obsoletions / Deprecations
Fixed issues
Fixes #16392