Ir para o conteúdo principal
Abnormal Psychology
   The Study of
 The study of abnormal thoughts, behaviors, and
  feelings.

 “Psycho” refers to “mind.”
   Derives from the Greek “Psyche” for “soul.”

 “Pathology” refers to “disease.”
The study of abnormal
 Thoughts
   Hearing voices

 Behaviours
   Starting to undress in public

 Feelings
   Overwhelming sense of sadness
Definitions of
Behaviour that is seen as a deviation from social norms.
   Deviation from the rules regulating how one should
   behave are seen as undesirable by the majority of
                    societies members.
 Standards of acceptable behaviour

 Expectations of behaviour

 Set by a social group

 Carried out by a social group
What is a ‘Norm’?

   Politeness [Desirable ‘norm’]
   Aggressiveness [Undesirable ‘norm’]

 Refers to deviant behaviour, anti social behaviour or
  undesirable behaviour
 Behaviour is considered to be abnormal if ‘Society’ or the
  majority considers it unacceptable or undesirable
Social ‘norms’ change over time

   Acceptable to not acceptable
     Drinking and driving
     Smoking

   Not acceptable to acceptable
     Homosexuality
     Having children out of wedlock
The context and the degree of the behaviour have to be considered
 No clear distinction between what is an abnormal deviation from a
  social norm
 Context of behaviour:
     Wearing a bathing suit on a beach would be considered normal
     Wearing a bathing suit to do your weekly shopping would be considered
      abnormal [simplistic and odd conduct]
   Degree of behaviour:
     Being rude would be considered deviant
     But how rude does one have to become before such behaviour is considered
      pathological?
Social norms are influence and defined by culture
   For instance Margaret Mead [1935] studied a number of tribes who lived in New
    Guinea
     The Arapesh were described as being gentle, loving and cooperative. Boys and
        girls were reared to attain both masculine and feminine characteristics. Both
        parents were said to bear a child and males took to their beds when their child
        was born Babes were looked after by males and females and treated gently.
     The Mundugumor were described as ex-cannibals and as assertive, fierce and
        aggressive. Both genders disliked matters related to childbearing and child
        rearing. Babies were often hung in scratchy baskets in dark places and were
        ignored when they cried.
    What might happen if a family from any one of the tribes went to live in another
    tribe and how might their behaviour be described by the dominant culture?
   Mental Illness is culturally relative
   Behaviour only makes sense when viewed within the originating
    culture
   Abnormality cannot be judged without reference to the standards of
    the culture where the behaivour arose
   A diagnosis of mental illness may be different for the same person
    in two different cultures:
     Cochrane [1977] found that Afro- Caribbean immigrants in the UK were
      more likely to be diagnosed as schizophrenics than whites. This high
      diagnosis for Afro-Caribbean’s is only found in the UK and not other
      countries
   Social deviance cannot offer a complete definition of abnormality because
    social norms change over time
   Mental health professional would be able to classify anyone who transgressed
    a social norm as being mentally ill
   Mental illness would be defined in terms of the social moral and attitudes of
    the time and may be subject to abuse

   Social deviance cannot offer a complete definition of abnormality as both
    context and the degree of behaviour has to be considered
   If context is considered behaviour may be nothing more than harmless
    eccentricity
   When the degree of a behaviour is considered there is no clear line between
    what is an abnormal deviation
   Social norms are influenced and defined by a culture and therefore
    behaviour only makes sense when viewed within the originating
    culture
   Abnormality cannot be judged without reference to the standards of
    the culture where the behaivour arose
   Therefore abnormal behaviour is culturally relative
Abnormal behaviour is judged in terms of being able to
   function adequately. Healthy people are judged as
 being able to operate within certain acceptable limits.
    If abnormal behaviour interferes with adequate
      functioning then one is considered abnormal.
 Individuals who cannot look after themselves or who are
  perceived to be irrational or out of control, are oft viewed
  as dysfunctional
   Rosenhan and Seligman [1989] propose seven major features that appear in
    abnormal behaviour as opposed to normal behaviour:
     SUFFERING: Most abnormal individuals report that they are suffering
     MALADPTIVENESS: Maladaptive behaviour that prevents an individual from achieving, from
        having fulfilling relationships, working effectively
       UNCONVENTIONALITY: Demonstrating unconventional behaviour which is unusual and
        differs from the way in which you would expect people to behave in similar situations
       LOSS OF CONTROL: You can usually predict what most people would do in a situation.
        Dysfunctional behaviour is unpredictable
       IRRATIONAL: There is no reason why a person is behaving in a specific way
       OBSERVER DISCOMFORT: Behaviour is governed by unspoken rules about how we should
        behave. When others break these we experience discomfort
       VIOLATION OF MORAL STANDARDS: When moral standards are violated this behaviour may
        be judged as abnormal or dysfunctional
 Who decides what is meant by ‘failure to function
  adequately’? [The individual or others?]
 Some dysfunctional behaviours maybe seen as adaptive
  and functional for the individual [Eating disorders and depression
  may lead to extra attention]
 Unusual behaviour may be a coping strategy for those who
  are experiencing a difficult period in their lives
 Ideas relating to ‘functioning adequately’ are culturally
  relative. You cannot use the standard of one culture to
  judge or measure the behaviour of another
Abnormality is seen as deviating from an ideal
positive mental health. Ideal mental health would
be seen as having a positive attitude towards the
   self, resistance to stress and, an accurate
               perception of reality.
   Abnormality can be diagnosed the same as physical ill health
   Reviewed what others had written about mental health and proposes that
    the absence of the following criteria indicates abnormality or a mental
    disorder
     Self attitude: having high self-esteem and a strong sense of identity
     Personal growth and self-actualisation: the extent to which a person develops
        their full capabilities
       Integration, such as being able to cope with stressful situations
       Autonomy: being independent and self regulating
       Having an accurate perception or reality
       Master of the environment: Including the ability to love, function at work and
        interpersonal relations, adjust to new situations and solve problems
 Who can achieve all this criteria?
 How many do we need to be lacking before one is judged as
  abnormal?
 Is mental health the same as physical health?
 Can it be diagnosed the same?
 This model is culturally relative, for instance the idea of
  self actualisation is relevant to individualistic cultures
Definition in detail