Skip to main content
Log in

To quote or not to quote: The effect of direct-speech appeals on donation in charity crowdfunding platforms

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On charity crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe, fundraisers largely rely on campaign appeals to engage and persuade potential donors. When appealing to prospective donors, fundraisers can either quote speeches from the beneficiaries to describe their dilemmas (direct-speech appeal) or present the same information descriptively without direct speech (non-direct-speech appeal). This research examines how, why and when direct-speech appeals affect the effectiveness of fundraising on charity crowdfunding platforms. In Study 1, we analyzed a secondary dataset of over 68,000 crowdfunding projects and found that direct-speech appeals are associated with larger donation amounts and more attracted donors. In Study 2, 3 and 4, we conducted controlled experiments to establish the causal relationship and explore the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. The convergent results show that direct-speech appeals positively affect donation outcomes. The effect is driven by increased perceived closeness toward beneficiaries elicited by direct-speech appeals and it is more pronounced among individuals with high mental imagery tendency and when the donation cause is urgent. Our research contributes to the literature on charity crowdfunding platforms and provides actionable insights for crowdfunding fundraisers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Norway)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of supporting data

The authors will supply the relevant data in response to reasonable requests.

Notes

  1. We also tested and demonstrated the mechanism using Chinese subjects, please see the supplementary study in Web Appendix E.

  2. We conducted a full sample analysis, including the eliminated projects, and found similar results (see Web Appendix B for details).

  3. As Credamo does not allow paying bonus to a specific participant, we informed participants during the debriefing prior to the lucky draw that if selected, they would receive the full bonus amount. This procedure ensured transparency and fairness, while aligning with the platform’s technical constraints.

  4. While the Johnson-Neyman analysis identified a significant simple effect of appeal type when the mental imagery tendency scores fell outside the interval [2.64, 5.21], we urge caution in interpreting the result near the lower bound of this interval. In our sample, only 10 participants (2.52%) reported a mental imagery tendency score below 4, indicating limited data support in this region.

References

  • Andreychik, M. R., & Lewis, E. (2017). Will you help me to suffer less? How about to feel more joy? Positive and negative empathy are associated with different other-oriented motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areni, C. S. (2003). The effects of structural and grammatical variables on persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 20(4), 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, A. S., Kihal, S. E., & Ellsaesser, F. (2023). Creating effective marketing messages through moderately surprising syntax. Journal of Marketing, 87(5), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231153582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydınoğlu, N. Z., & Krishna, A. (2019). The power of consumption-imagery in communicating retail-store deals. Journal of Retailing, 95(4), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, B. K., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701530748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Packard, G. (2023). Wisdom from words: The psychology of consumer language. Consumer Psychology Review, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Kim, Y. D., & Meyer, R. (2021). What makes content engaging? How emotional dynamics shape success. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio Rizzo, G. L., Ordenes, V., Pozharliev, F., De Angelis, R., M., & Costabile, M. (2024). How High-Arousal Language shapes Micro- versus Macro-Influencers’ impact. Journal of Marketing, 88(4), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231207636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Rangan, P., & Singh, S. N. (2016). Do cold images cause cold-heartedness? The impact of visual stimuli on the effectiveness of negative emotional charity appeals. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1185982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764. https://doi.org/10.2307/414729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, G., van Esch, P., Jain, S. P., & Cui, Y. G. (2023). Donor happiness comes from afar: The role of donation beneficiary social distance and benevolence. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(4), 865–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Koning, B. B., Bos, L. T., Wassenburg, S. I., & van der Schoot, M. (2017). Effects of a reading strategy training aimed at improving mental simulation in primary school children. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Z., & Dong, Q. (2001). Construction of a knowledge system and its impact on Chinese research. Contemporary Linguistics, 3(1), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. (2016). Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 712–727. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The visual depiction effect in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2022). A review of sensory imagery for consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, A. (2020). And i quote: Forms and functions of quotations in prime minister’s questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 157, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2004). Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridou, G. A., Peerdeman, K. J., & Schaefer, R. S. (2022). Individual differences in mental imagery in different modalities and levels of intentionality. Memory & Cognition, 50(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01209-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galak, J., Small, D., & Stephen, A. T. (2011). Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S130–S137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, F., Park, J., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (2022). How you talk about it matters: Cultural variation in communication directness in romantic relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(6), 583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. K., & Lim, S. (2018). When consumers prefer to give material gifts instead of experiences: The role of social distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunraj, D. N., Drumm-Hewitt, A. M., & Klin, C. M. (2014). Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character’s linguistic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.

  • Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical research memoirs.

  • Just, M. A., Newman, S. D., Keller, T. A., McEleney, A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2004). Imagery in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21(1), 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaju, A., & Maglio, S. J. (2018). Urgently yours: Temporal communication norms and psychological distance. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamatham, S. H., Pahwa, P., Jiang, J., & Kumar, N. (2021). Effect of appeal content on fundraising success and donor behavior. Journal of Business Research, 125, 827–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A., & Maglio, S. J. (2021). Text is gendered: The role of letter case. Marketing Letters, 32(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94(2), 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., & Park, J. (2020). The relationship between a charity crowdfunding project’s contents and donors’ participation: An empirical study with deep learning methodologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, Article 106261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2022). The use of direct and indirect speech across psychological distance. Memory & Cognition, 50(8), 1816–1825. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01267-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., Chen, Z., & Lei, J. (2016). Inspire me to donate: The use of strength emotion in donation appeals. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). The effects of linguistic coordination on perceived quality of consumer reviews: A dual process perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(4), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221150933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. A. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review Of General Psychology, 11(2), 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, K. R., Lee, M. S., & Sauer, P. L. (1995). The combined influence hypothesis: Central and peripheral antecedents of attitude toward the ad. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonnell, R., & White, K. (2015). How construals of money versus time impact consumer charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, A., & Bose, I. (2018). My words for your pizza: An analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding. Information & Management, 55(6), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Market Research Future (2025). Crowdfunding Market Size, Share and Industry Trends 2032. Market Research Future. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/crowdfunding-market-22857. Accessed 21 February 2025.

  • Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nook, E. C., Schleider, J. L., & Somerville, L. H. (2017). A linguistic signature of psychological distancing in emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostinelli, M., & Luna, D. (2022a). Syntax and the illusion of fit: How grammatical subject influences persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostinelli, M., & Luna, D. (2022b). Syntax and the illusion of fit: How grammatical subject influences persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, G., & Berger, J. (2017). How language shapes word of mouth’s impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 572–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, G., & Berger, J. (2024). The emergence and evolution of consumer language research. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, H. T., Zhou, X., & Chu, M. (2024). Cross-cultural differences in using nonverbal behaviors to identify indirect replies. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 48(2), 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, J., Clifford, C. W., & Tong, F. (2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology, 18(13), 982–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (pp. 1–24). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1

  • Pogacar, R., Shrum, L., & Lowrey, T. M. (2018). The effects of linguistic devices on consumer information processing and persuasion: A language complexity× processing mode framework. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 689–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D., Pearson, D. G., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator’s theoretical views. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe, J., Altenmüller, M. S., & Gollwitzer, M. (2025). The double-edged sword of informality: How informal communication shapes closeness and trustworthiness in personal and professional relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(5), 1149–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sela, A., Wheeler, S. C., & Sarial-Abi, G. (2012). We are not the same as You and I: Causal effects of minor language variations on consumers’ attitudes toward brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/664972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepehri, A., Duclos, R., Kristofferson, K., Vinoo, P., & Elahi, H. (2021). The power of indirect appeals in peer-to‐peer fundraising: Why S/He can raise more money for me than I can for myself. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spronck, S., & Nikitina, T. (2019). Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology, 23(1), 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stites, M. C., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The psychologist said quickly, dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed! Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, L., Sengupta, J., Li, Y., & Chen, F. (2024). Want versus need: How linguistic framing influences responses to crowdfunding appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(5), 923–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suggate, S., & Lenhard, W. (2022). Mental imagery skill predicts adults’ reading performance. Learning and Instruction, 80, Article 101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. (2017). Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieites, Y., Goldszmidt, R., & Andrade, E. B. (2022). Social class shapes donation allocation preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, E., & Clark, H. H. (1993). Reproduction and demonstration in quotations. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waites, S. F., Farmer, A., Hasford, J., & Welden, R. (2023). Teach a man to fish: The use of autonomous aid in eliciting donations. Journal Of Marketing Research, 60(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221140028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Karimi, S. (2019). This product works well (for me): The impact of first-person singular pronouns on online review helpfulness. Journal of Business Research, 104, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Max, Hong, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2022). Machine learning for creativity: Using similarity networks to design better crowdfunding projects. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211005481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.4.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/675927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & RossJr, W. T. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, D., Zhang, L., Tao, Q., Wang, Y., & Ma, S. (2019). Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: An empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00638-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Lin, H., Pan, Y., Ren, H., & Chen, J. (2008). Constructing the affective lexicon ontology. Journal Of The China Society For Scientific And Technical Information, 27(2), 180–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Q., & Chen, R. (2014). Gift cards and gifted cash: The impact of fit between gift type and message construal. Journal of Retailing, 90(4), 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition, 121(3), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3146–3152. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, B., Taylor, J. R., Banks, B., & Kotz, S. A. (2021). Reading direct speech quotes increases theta phase-locking: Evidence for cortical tracking of inner speech? Neuroimage, 239, Article 118313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani, E., Chakravarty, A., & Inman, J. (2025). (Mis) alignment between facial and textual emotions and its effects on donors engagement behavior in online crowdsourcing platforms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53(4),968–988.

  • Zhao, M., & Xie, J. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, K., Lina, Z., & Xia, Z. (2022). Multi-modal emotion expression and online charity crowdfunding success. Decision Support Systems, 163, Article 113842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 72302227); the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (Grant number: 22XNLG08; 202330269); Outstanding Innovative Talents Cultivation Funded Programs 2024 of Renmin University of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ziqi Zhang and Xuejiao Lin. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ziqi Zhang and Qiang (Kris) Zhou, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Kris Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Francesca Sotgiu served as Area Editor for this article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX. 6.13 MB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Lin, X., Zhou, Q.K. et al. To quote or not to quote: The effect of direct-speech appeals on donation in charity crowdfunding platforms. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01122-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01122-4

Keywords