Abstract
On charity crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe, fundraisers largely rely on campaign appeals to engage and persuade potential donors. When appealing to prospective donors, fundraisers can either quote speeches from the beneficiaries to describe their dilemmas (direct-speech appeal) or present the same information descriptively without direct speech (non-direct-speech appeal). This research examines how, why and when direct-speech appeals affect the effectiveness of fundraising on charity crowdfunding platforms. In Study 1, we analyzed a secondary dataset of over 68,000 crowdfunding projects and found that direct-speech appeals are associated with larger donation amounts and more attracted donors. In Study 2, 3 and 4, we conducted controlled experiments to establish the causal relationship and explore the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. The convergent results show that direct-speech appeals positively affect donation outcomes. The effect is driven by increased perceived closeness toward beneficiaries elicited by direct-speech appeals and it is more pronounced among individuals with high mental imagery tendency and when the donation cause is urgent. Our research contributes to the literature on charity crowdfunding platforms and provides actionable insights for crowdfunding fundraisers.





Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of supporting data
The authors will supply the relevant data in response to reasonable requests.
Notes
We also tested and demonstrated the mechanism using Chinese subjects, please see the supplementary study in Web Appendix E.
We conducted a full sample analysis, including the eliminated projects, and found similar results (see Web Appendix B for details).
As Credamo does not allow paying bonus to a specific participant, we informed participants during the debriefing prior to the lucky draw that if selected, they would receive the full bonus amount. This procedure ensured transparency and fairness, while aligning with the platform’s technical constraints.
While the Johnson-Neyman analysis identified a significant simple effect of appeal type when the mental imagery tendency scores fell outside the interval [2.64, 5.21], we urge caution in interpreting the result near the lower bound of this interval. In our sample, only 10 participants (2.52%) reported a mental imagery tendency score below 4, indicating limited data support in this region.
References
Andreychik, M. R., & Lewis, E. (2017). Will you help me to suffer less? How about to feel more joy? Positive and negative empathy are associated with different other-oriented motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 139–149.
Areni, C. S. (2003). The effects of structural and grammatical variables on persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 20(4), 349–375.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596.
Atalay, A. S., Kihal, S. E., & Ellsaesser, F. (2023). Creating effective marketing messages through moderately surprising syntax. Journal of Marketing, 87(5), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231153582
Aydınoğlu, N. Z., & Krishna, A. (2019). The power of consumption-imagery in communicating retail-store deals. Journal of Retailing, 95(4), 116–127.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70.
Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20145
Bergen, B. K., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701530748
Berger, J., & Packard, G. (2023). Wisdom from words: The psychology of consumer language. Consumer Psychology Review, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1085
Berger, J., Kim, Y. D., & Meyer, R. (2021). What makes content engaging? How emotional dynamics shape success. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab010
Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(1), 43–57.
Cascio Rizzo, G. L., Ordenes, V., Pozharliev, F., De Angelis, R., M., & Costabile, M. (2024). How High-Arousal Language shapes Micro- versus Macro-Influencers’ impact. Journal of Marketing, 88(4), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231207636
Choi, J., Rangan, P., & Singh, S. N. (2016). Do cold images cause cold-heartedness? The impact of visual stimuli on the effectiveness of negative emotional charity appeals. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1185982
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764. https://doi.org/10.2307/414729
Das, G., van Esch, P., Jain, S. P., & Cui, Y. G. (2023). Donor happiness comes from afar: The role of donation beneficiary social distance and benevolence. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(4), 865–880.
de Koning, B. B., Bos, L. T., Wassenburg, S. I., & van der Schoot, M. (2017). Effects of a reading strategy training aimed at improving mental simulation in primary school children. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 869–889.
Dong, Z., & Dong, Q. (2001). Construction of a knowledge system and its impact on Chinese research. Contemporary Linguistics, 3(1), 33–44.
Dubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. (2016). Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 712–727. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0312
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697.
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The visual depiction effect in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988–1003.
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2022). A review of sensory imagery for consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1242
Fetzer, A. (2020). And i quote: Forms and functions of quotations in prime minister’s questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 157, 89–100.
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2004). Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 547–557.
Floridou, G. A., Peerdeman, K. J., & Schaefer, R. S. (2022). Individual differences in mental imagery in different modalities and levels of intentionality. Memory & Cognition, 50(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01209-7
Galak, J., Small, D., & Stephen, A. T. (2011). Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S130–S137.
Ge, F., Park, J., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (2022). How you talk about it matters: Cultural variation in communication directness in romantic relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(6), 583–602.
Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26.
Goodman, J. K., & Lim, S. (2018). When consumers prefer to give material gifts instead of experiences: The role of social distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy010
Gunraj, D. N., Drumm-Hewitt, A. M., & Klin, C. M. (2014). Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character’s linguistic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034853
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660.
Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical research memoirs.
Just, M. A., Newman, S. D., Keller, T. A., McEleney, A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2004). Imagery in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21(1), 112–124.
Kaju, A., & Maglio, S. J. (2018). Urgently yours: Temporal communication norms and psychological distance. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1051
Kamatham, S. H., Pahwa, P., Jiang, J., & Kumar, N. (2021). Effect of appeal content on fundraising success and donor behavior. Journal of Business Research, 125, 827–839.
Kim, A., & Maglio, S. J. (2021). Text is gendered: The role of letter case. Marketing Letters, 32(2), 179–190.
Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706–713.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94(2), 148.
Lee, D., & Park, J. (2020). The relationship between a charity crowdfunding project’s contents and donors’ participation: An empirical study with deep learning methodologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, Article 106261.
Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735–747.
Li, J., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2022). The use of direct and indirect speech across psychological distance. Memory & Cognition, 50(8), 1816–1825. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01267-x
Liang, J., Chen, Z., & Lei, J. (2016). Inspire me to donate: The use of strength emotion in donation appeals. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.09.001
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534.
Liu, A. X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). The effects of linguistic coordination on perceived quality of consumer reviews: A dual process perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(4), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221150933
Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. A. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review Of General Psychology, 11(2), 112–126.
Lord, K. R., Lee, M. S., & Sauer, P. L. (1995). The combined influence hypothesis: Central and peripheral antecedents of attitude toward the ad. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 73–85.
Macdonnell, R., & White, K. (2015). How construals of money versus time impact consumer charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv042
Majumdar, A., & Bose, I. (2018). My words for your pizza: An analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding. Information & Management, 55(6), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.007
Market Research Future (2025). Crowdfunding Market Size, Share and Industry Trends 2032. Market Research Future. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/crowdfunding-market-22857. Accessed 21 February 2025.
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
Nook, E. C., Schleider, J. L., & Somerville, L. H. (2017). A linguistic signature of psychological distancing in emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000263
Ostinelli, M., & Luna, D. (2022a). Syntax and the illusion of fit: How grammatical subject influences persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab021
Ostinelli, M., & Luna, D. (2022b). Syntax and the illusion of fit: How grammatical subject influences persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab021
Packard, G., & Berger, J. (2017). How language shapes word of mouth’s impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 572–588.
Packard, G., & Berger, J. (2024). The emergence and evolution of consumer language research. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(1), 42–51.
Pang, H. T., Zhou, X., & Chu, M. (2024). Cross-cultural differences in using nonverbal behaviors to identify indirect replies. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 48(2), 323–344.
Pearson, J., Clifford, C. W., & Tong, F. (2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology, 18(13), 982–986.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (pp. 1–24). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
Pogacar, R., Shrum, L., & Lowrey, T. M. (2018). The effects of linguistic devices on consumer information processing and persuasion: A language complexity× processing mode framework. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 689–711.
Reisberg, D., Pearson, D. G., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator’s theoretical views. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.858
Schwabe, J., Altenmüller, M. S., & Gollwitzer, M. (2025). The double-edged sword of informality: How informal communication shapes closeness and trustworthiness in personal and professional relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(5), 1149–1177.
Sela, A., Wheeler, S. C., & Sarial-Abi, G. (2012). We are not the same as You and I: Causal effects of minor language variations on consumers’ attitudes toward brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/664972
Sepehri, A., Duclos, R., Kristofferson, K., Vinoo, P., & Elahi, H. (2021). The power of indirect appeals in peer-to‐peer fundraising: Why S/He can raise more money for me than I can for myself. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1232
Spronck, S., & Nikitina, T. (2019). Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology, 23(1), 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0005
Stites, M. C., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The psychologist said quickly, dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed! Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7
Su, L., Sengupta, J., Li, Y., & Chen, F. (2024). Want versus need: How linguistic framing influences responses to crowdfunding appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(5), 923–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad033
Suggate, S., & Lenhard, W. (2022). Mental imagery skill predicts adults’ reading performance. Learning and Instruction, 80, Article 101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101633
Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. (2017). Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000089
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403.
Vieites, Y., Goldszmidt, R., & Andrade, E. B. (2022). Social class shapes donation allocation preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab033
Wade, E., & Clark, H. H. (1993). Reproduction and demonstration in quotations. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1040
Waites, S. F., Farmer, A., Hasford, J., & Welden, R. (2023). Teach a man to fish: The use of autonomous aid in eliciting donations. Journal Of Marketing Research, 60(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221140028
Wang, F., & Karimi, S. (2019). This product works well (for me): The impact of first-person singular pronouns on online review helpfulness. Journal of Business Research, 104, 283–294.
Wei, Y., Max, Hong, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2022). Machine learning for creativity: Using similarity networks to design better crowdfunding projects. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211005481
White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.4.109
Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/675927
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & RossJr, W. T. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 199–214.
Xiang, D., Zhang, L., Tao, Q., Wang, Y., & Ma, S. (2019). Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: An empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00638-w
Xu, L., Lin, H., Pan, Y., Ren, H., & Chen, J. (2008). Constructing the affective lexicon ontology. Journal Of The China Society For Scientific And Technical Information, 27(2), 180–185.
Yao, Q., & Chen, R. (2014). Gift cards and gifted cash: The impact of fit between gift type and message construal. Journal of Retailing, 90(4), 481–492.
Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition, 121(3), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.007
Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3146–3152. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00022
Yao, B., Taylor, J. R., Banks, B., & Kotz, S. A. (2021). Reading direct speech quotes increases theta phase-locking: Evidence for cortical tracking of inner speech? Neuroimage, 239, Article 118313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118313
Yazdani, E., Chakravarty, A., & Inman, J. (2025). (Mis) alignment between facial and textual emotions and its effects on donors engagement behavior in online crowdsourcing platforms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53(4),968–988.
Zhao, M., & Xie, J. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486–496.
Zhao, K., Lina, Z., & Xia, Z. (2022). Multi-modal emotion expression and online charity crowdfunding success. Decision Support Systems, 163, Article 113842.
Funding
This research was supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 72302227); the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (Grant number: 22XNLG08; 202330269); Outstanding Innovative Talents Cultivation Funded Programs 2024 of Renmin University of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ziqi Zhang and Xuejiao Lin. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ziqi Zhang and Qiang (Kris) Zhou, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Francesca Sotgiu served as Area Editor for this article.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Lin, X., Zhou, Q.K. et al. To quote or not to quote: The effect of direct-speech appeals on donation in charity crowdfunding platforms. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01122-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01122-4
