-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
Dismissal voting #748
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
AB DecisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionFO/CouncilIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection HandlingIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
AB DecisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionFO/CouncilIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection HandlingIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
But later...
If dismissal is supposed to be so rare, why is it not a decision with a higher bar (e.g., supermajority)?
The underlying concern here is that a close vote appears more contentious / political, and might affect the legitimacy of any decisions that the resulting Council makes.