The repeat syntax definition uses <positive-integer> as its first argument; this goes back to the first WD. It's not entirely clear if this was meant to be 1+ or 0+, so that needs to be clarified.
(It should also switch over to the new css-values syntax for range restrictions.)
The repeat syntax definition uses
<positive-integer>as its first argument; this goes back to the first WD. It's not entirely clear if this was meant to be 1+ or 0+, so that needs to be clarified.(It should also switch over to the new css-values syntax for range restrictions.)