Replies: 1 comment 10 replies
-
|
Hello @colazzo Have you tried using the inheritance and See this unit test: python-sdbus/test/test_sd_bus_async.py Lines 315 to 327 in 9040f15 I have not tested it but it should be possible to use the overridden property and the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I should fix
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That would be great, thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I actually use now a work-around by using a private method inside the sub-class which first sets the new property value, followed by the call to setter_private in the parent class using super(). I just need to first add manually the corresponding @.setter_private methods in the generated class file. For future version it would be nice to have these private methods generated for the properties with access="read", |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@colazzo I added a property override private setter in 513fd92. Could you give it a test? I also made a significant rework of internal meta classes. The code existing code using public interfaces should work exactly the same but some implementation details have changed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @igo95862 I did a test locally and it seems to be working fine: The Property stays read-only and I can set new value using the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
Is there a way to set a read-only property from the server class that implements the interface without changing the generated interface file?
Such property is typically set at runtime by the server that implements the interface, and it is not enough to use a member variable directly because in most cases you want the 'property changed' signal being fired when the property is set internally by the server.
I guess the
@sdbus.setter_privatecan only be defined in the interface class in order to be able to useset_async()on the property?But then you would need to manually change the interface file after having generated from xml.
Is there a way to set property (with property changed signal) without changing the generated file?
Ideally you can define everything in the xml, run the generator and implement the interface for your dbus service.
An idea would be to generate the
@sdbus.setter_privatein case the property is defined withaccess="read",and provide possibility to override the private setter.
Same for
access="readwrite"properties where you could have the@sdbus.setteralready generated.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions