@sdb9696 looks like your UK variant includes a couple of new "components" besides the protocol change. I'm wondering if we should keep including the complete model name in the filenames like it was done for the legacy fixtures?

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5e2fcd2) 79.66% compared to head (003911d) 79.66%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #562   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.66%   79.66%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        2995     2995           
  Branches      779      779           
=======================================
  Hits         2386     2386           
  Misses        536      536           
  Partials       73       73           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sdb9696 looks like your UK variant includes a couple of new "components" besides the protocol change. I'm wondering if we should keep including the complete model name in the filenames like it was done for the legacy fixtures?

Yes I realised I inadvertently dropped the regional variant and plan to fix very soon. :-)

@sdb9696 looks like your UK variant includes a couple of new "components" besides the protocol change. I'm wondering if we should keep including the complete model name in the filenames like it was done for the legacy fixtures?

Yes I realised I inadvertently dropped the regional variant and plan to fix very soon. :-)

#566

Apologies you'll need to regenerate this with the latest #566 as it still has the .smart suffix which we removed in favour of subfolders.

No worries, I just renamed it (based on the filename given out using the PR) :-)