Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe then update the comment
Seems that this was done for the cycle GC - if this is no longer needed, just remove the comment?
Out of curiousity: is it safe in release builds to let the cycle GC see invalid values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We want to have "deferred" references on the stack, which means that the GC must be able to see all stack values, and only valid stack values.
Setting the stack pointer to
NULLis only useful for our asserts, which are sprinkled throughout to make sure that we're spilling and restoring in the correct places. Basically, the GC should never see an invalid stack pointer. On debug builds, we make this easier to detect by setting invalid stack pointers toNULLand checking for this.Either way, I'll update the comment.