As an aside, it seems inconsistent to me that process.version is prefixed with a v, but process.versions.node isn't. Would it be worth opening an issue to discuss that?

I'd need to check, but I think that was intentional. process.version preceded process.versions and using the 'v' seemed like a mistake because almost nobody ever needs it and has to strip it out to deal with the version as a number. But changing process.version would cause too much ecosystem breakage.

I'd need to check, but I think that was intentional. process.version preceded process.versions and using the 'v' seemed like a mistake because almost nobody ever needs it and has to strip it out to deal with the version as a number. But changing process.version would cause too much ecosystem breakage.

If my recollection is correct, it may be worthwhile to have a discussion about documentation-deprecating process.version to point people at process.versions.node instead.

If my recollection is correct, it may be worthwhile to have a discussion about documentation-deprecating process.version to point people at process.versions.node instead.

Or that conversation might be made unnecessary by the change here. Maybe it's enough to direct people to the right thing.

Landed in 0dae5d9