Skip to content

chore(manager): pending blocks err #1827

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
tuxcanfly merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

chore(manager): pending blocks err #1827

tuxcanfly merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

@tuxcanfly
Copy link
Contributor

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly commented Sep 3, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Overview

This PR improves the error message when pending blocks limit is reached to indicate that block production is being intentionally refused.

Fixes #1813

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved clarity of error messages related to block publishing limits, enhancing user understanding of refusal to create new blocks.

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly requested review from MSevey and tzdybal September 3, 2024 20:20
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the error message in the publishBlock method of the Manager class. The new message clarifies that block creation is refused due to the number of pending blocks reaching a configured limit, enhancing the clarity of the error communicated to users.

Changes

Files Change Summary
block/manager.go Updated the error message in publishBlock method to clarify refusal of block creation due to pending blocks limit.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve pending blocks limit error message (#1813) ✅

Poem

In the land where blocks do play,
A message clearer saves the day!
No more confusion, just a cheer,
"Pending blocks, please wait right here!"
Hops of joy, we now can see,
A brighter path for you and me! 🐰✨

Tip

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested a review from a team September 3, 2024 20:20
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87c27c2 and 292fcff.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • block/manager.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • block/manager.go

MSevey
MSevey reviewed Sep 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.81%. Comparing base (87c27c2) to head (292fcff).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
block/manager.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1827      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.89%   43.81%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          76       76              
  Lines       10028    10029       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         4402     4394       -8     
- Misses       4893     4900       +7     
- Partials      733      735       +2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit fc5fdf6 Sep 4, 2024
@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly deleted the tux/err-pending-blocks branch September 4, 2024 15:20
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2024
Merged
@tac0turtle tac0turtle removed this from Evolve Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya gupadhyaya approved these changes

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal approved these changes

@tzdybal tzdybal Awaiting requested review from tzdybal

+2 more reviewers

@MSevey MSevey MSevey left review comments

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

da: improve pending blocks limit error message

5 participants

@tuxcanfly @gupadhyaya @MSevey @Manav-Aggarwal