Skip to content

chore: Update auto_request_review.yml #1675

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
Manav-Aggarwal merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024
Merged

chore: Update auto_request_review.yml #1675

Manav-Aggarwal merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024

Conversation

@MSevey
Copy link
Contributor

@MSevey MSevey commented May 20, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Overview

I created a new rollkit team @rollkit/core to capture the core team and enable us to make these review files more simple.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated review process by removing individual reviewers and adding the team:core to the rollkit group for more streamlined code reviews.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 20, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The .github/auto_request_review.yml file has been updated to streamline the review process. Individual reviewers have been removed, and a team, team:core, has been added to the rollkit group. This change aims to enhance efficiency and ensure that reviews are handled by a dedicated team.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/auto_request_review.yml Removed individual reviewers (Manav-Aggarwal, tzdybal, gupadhyaya, tuxcanfly), added team:core to rollkit group

🐇✨ In the code's vast, intricate dance,
A team now takes a unified stance.
Reviewers shift, a streamlined flow,
Efficiency in every line we sow.
With team:core, we rise and shine,
Together, our code will always align. 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed May 20, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83c29ed and 4baaf0b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal enabled auto-merge May 20, 2024 14:25
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal added this pull request to the merge queue May 20, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9814a81 May 20, 2024
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal deleted the MSevey-patch-1 branch May 20, 2024 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya gupadhyaya approved these changes

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal approved these changes

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly Awaiting requested review from tuxcanfly

+1 more reviewer

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@MSevey MSevey

Labels

None yet

Projects

Evolve
Archived in project

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@MSevey @gupadhyaya @Manav-Aggarwal