I suggest adding asynchronous functions to the README usage.#442
I suggest adding asynchronous functions to the README usage.#4422525nicole wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
This is great, thank you @2525nicole! If it's not too much trouble, would you mind updating all quotes to single quotes, and revert formatting of markdown tables, so we can minimize the differences and see the actual changes that were made? I will still merge this in if you don't have time. Thanks again! |
|
Hello, @jonschlinkert :) First and foremost, I would like to sincerely thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to send me a positive message and promptly review my pull request. I would also like to apologize for inadvertently making unnecessary changes in your previous pull request. I will now modify the code and submit it to you! |
|
Thank you for your patience, @jonschlinkert ! |
|
@jonschlinkert |
Thank you for providing a great library!
If I run the code as written in the README usage, I get an error.
I propose the following modifications to solve this problem and make it easier for beginners like me to use.
There is a note nearby about asynchronous functions, but it would be more helpful if the sample code could be executed as is :)
・CommonJS does not support top-level await, so introduce asynchronous functions.
・For Multiple prompts, added code to import modules.