[Feature] Support preconfiguration via Policy continued - #14422
[Feature] Support preconfiguration via Policy continued#14422eveeifyeve wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
feat: add managed schema for chrome fix: firefox warning about unknown key storage in manifest chore: format and sync new settings wip: make managed settings take priority docs: policy settings feat(settings): add policy storage for firefox
|
I will be happy to provide a commit for nix dirvation for testing before merging remove that commit. |
|
CC @alexanderby @darkreaderdev for review. |
|
Aight, here we go to wait another year here |
|
dw I will ping those people every month, because this just can't be waited to be reviewed. And nix users have a default.nix to use for testing. |
|
I won't touch anything here but I can request review from Alexander - so one more ping will be sent to him. 😉 |
|
Just FYI, there's a typo in Also, I can't get the |
|
It seems Home Manager added extension settings through This setting only supports "addon@darkreader.org".settings = {
syncSettings = false;
};Plus, it only works if you installed extensions with |
|
What's going on with this PR @alexanderby? It's fine if you aren't interested in merging this, but could you please let us know one way or another? |
Fixed. |
|
Thanks for fixing that issue, @eveeifyeve ! Also, yes, I’d love to see this merged. As @waltmck said, are there any updates on this @alexanderby ? Thanks |
|
Would be great to see this merged... |
I think the only issue with this pr is the nix file, but I am not sure still waiting on @alexanderby response. |
|
@voronind-com 's comment aged well...
In all seriousness, I'd love to see this merged as well. |
|
Thanks for the contribution and for keeping the discussion active. To clarify why this PR has not moved forward: adding declarative preconfiguration via policies (
Because of this overhead, we are hesitant to expand the configuration surface area without dedicated long-term maintainers for policy-based deployment workflows. @alexanderby Could you confirm this point of view so we can make a final call here? |
For the record, that's the model I would want (overwriting runtime user adjustments), and what we use in all my Firefox Extensions Declarative forks, including our Dark Reader fork. |
Continued pr.
Closes #12920.
Added @nenikitov as co author