Skip to content

Conversation

@matifali
Copy link
Member

@matifali matifali commented Nov 11, 2025

Addresses some feedback from #20640

"title": "MCP Tools Injection",
"description": "How to configure MCP servers for tools injection through AI Bridge",
"path": "./ai-coder/ai-bridge/mcp.md",
"state": ["early access"]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Marking the MCP Tools injection section explicitly as Early Access. We would like to keep this feature opt-in and EA even after AI Bridge itself graduates to Beta or GA.

Template admins can pre-configure workspaces to route all AI tool requests through AI Bridge, providing a seamless and secure experience for users. This can be done for both Coder Tasks and other AI tools running in the workspace.
Template admins can pre-configure workspaces to route all AI tool requests through AI Bridge, providing a seamless and secure experience for users. This can be done with either [Coder Tasks](../tasks.md) or AI agents running in the workspace.

### Using Coder Tasks
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still think mentioning Coder Tasks here is distracting and unnecessary.
We're still talking about the basic setup here. Tasks is an optional integration, therefore it should have lower hierarchical priority.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will try to come up with a different version. Or we can drop Taks. Thoughts @david-fraley?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should absolutely keep the Tasks section, but not make it sound like Tasks are required for Bridge to work.

Copy link
Member Author

@matifali matifali Nov 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you think about it now? a106652

@matifali matifali force-pushed the aibridge-docs-review branch from 2479f38 to a106652 Compare November 11, 2025 14:33
Copy link
Contributor

@dannykopping dannykopping left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for reorganising the doc 👍
One suggestion but LGTM

Co-authored-by: Danny Kopping <danny@coder.com>
@matifali matifali enabled auto-merge (squash) November 11, 2025 15:09
@matifali matifali merged commit 086d6b8 into main Nov 11, 2025
25 checks passed
@matifali matifali deleted the aibridge-docs-review branch November 11, 2025 15:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 11, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants