Skip to content

Conversation

@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 commented Dec 3, 2025

What does this PR do?

  • Bump appwrite version to 1.8.1

Test Plan

Automated tests should pass.

In addition, the following manual tests should be performed:

docker compose build
docker tag appwrite-dev appwrite/appwrite:1.8.1
docker run -it --rm \
    --volume /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \
    --volume "$(pwd)"/appwrite:/usr/src/code/appwrite:rw \
    --entrypoint=install \
    appwrite/appwrite:1.8.1

Related PRs and Issues

Checklist

  • Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
  • If the PR includes a change to an API's metadata (desc, label, params, etc.), does it also include updated API specs and example docs?

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat-1.8.1-release-prep

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Security Scan Results for PR

Docker Image Scan Results

Package Version Vulnerability Severity
imagemagick 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-c++ 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-dev 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-heic 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-jpeg 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-jxl 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-libs 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-openexr 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
imagemagick-webp 7.1.2.3-r0 CVE-2025-62171 HIGH
libecpg 17.6-r0 CVE-2025-12818 HIGH
libecpg-dev 17.6-r0 CVE-2025-12818 HIGH
libpng 1.6.47-r0 CVE-2025-64720 HIGH
libpng 1.6.47-r0 CVE-2025-65018 HIGH
libpng-dev 1.6.47-r0 CVE-2025-64720 HIGH
libpng-dev 1.6.47-r0 CVE-2025-65018 HIGH
libpq 17.6-r0 CVE-2025-12818 HIGH
libpq-dev 17.6-r0 CVE-2025-12818 HIGH
libxml2 2.13.8-r0 CVE-2025-49794 CRITICAL
libxml2 2.13.8-r0 CVE-2025-49796 CRITICAL
libxml2 2.13.8-r0 CVE-2025-49795 HIGH
libxml2 2.13.8-r0 CVE-2025-6021 HIGH
postgresql17-dev 17.6-r0 CVE-2025-12818 HIGH
github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 v2.0.2 CVE-2024-25621 HIGH
golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 CVE-2025-22869 HIGH
golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.24.0 CVE-2025-22868 HIGH
stdlib 1.22.10 CVE-2025-47907 HIGH
stdlib 1.22.10 CVE-2025-58183 HIGH
stdlib 1.22.10 CVE-2025-58186 HIGH
stdlib 1.22.10 CVE-2025-58187 HIGH
stdlib 1.22.10 CVE-2025-61729 HIGH

Source Code Scan Results

🎉 No vulnerabilities found!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

✨ Benchmark results

  • Requests per second: 1,148
  • Requests with 200 status code: 206,725
  • P99 latency: 0.170101633

⚡ Benchmark Comparison

Metric This PR Latest version
RPS 1,148 1,207
200 206,725 217,241
P99 0.170101633 0.172752394

stnguyen90 and others added 3 commits December 3, 2025 13:53
Co-authored-by: stnguyen90 <1477010+stnguyen90@users.noreply.github.com>
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
2 tasks
Copilot AI and others added 6 commits December 4, 2025 22:02
…n V23

Co-authored-by: stnguyen90 <1477010+stnguyen90@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: stnguyen90 <1477010+stnguyen90@users.noreply.github.com>
…-for-1-8-1

Complete V23 migration for 1.8.1: add user email attributes and fix fall-through bug
Co-authored-by: stnguyen90 <1477010+stnguyen90@users.noreply.github.com>
…-1-8-1

Add CHANGES.md section for version 1.8.1
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants