Skip to content

Conversation

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

Following actions from discussions on dev ML regarding removing awsapi and preferring ec2stack. Reference from last PR: #44 Opening a new one as master has changed since then and rebasing caused several conflicts so this PR consists of 3 patches (to make rebasing easier).

- Removes awsapi and awsapi-setup
- Removes awsapi packaging rules for debian, centos63, centos7, fedora 20/21
- Removes catalina port 7080 service configs
- Fixes build replace properties for AWSAPILOG
- Removes maven profile for building awsapi and deploying db in developer profile
- Removes awsapi db properties usage across codebase
- Removes references from spring xmls, test cases and TransactionLegacy
- Adds sql command to drop database cloudbridge in schema-451to460-cleanup.sql

CentOS 7, CentOS 6.3, Debian repository: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/nukeawsapi
TravisCI: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/60704658

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Apr 30, 2015

sebgoa on dev@cloudstack.apache.org replies:
Rohit, give me couple days :

1-to get the ec2stack donation finished and the code imported.
2-we should merge this once we agree on a 4.6 release management method.
awsapi and preferring ec2stack. Reference from last PR: =
#44 Opening a new one as master =
has changed since then and rebasing caused several conflicts so this PR =
consists of 3 patches (to make rebasing easier).
fedora 20/21
developer profile
TransactionLegacy
schema-451to460-cleanup.sql
http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/nukeawsapi
awsapi and
fedora 20/21
developer profile
path
TransactionLegacy
schema-451to460-cleanup.sql
your
feature
please
ticket

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Apr 30, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #75 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Apr 30, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #74 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member Author

@Runseb - Sure. I was testing 4.5 today and the awsapi service did not work for me, after wasting almost 2 hours to make it work, I tried ec2stack which worked out of the box. I thought it would be a good idea to get rid of it and promote ec2stack :)

I’ve split the changes in 3 commits to make it easier to rebase/merge. I’ll keep this open and hope to merge it next week but am interested in merge it now to avoid rebasing efforts again. If ec2stack will get its own git repo like docs repos or cloudmonkey - does it matter if we merge this now or next week and will this block 4.6 release management?

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Apr 30, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #76 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Apr 30, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #77 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@sebgoa
Copy link
Member

sebgoa commented Apr 30, 2015

-Sebastien

On 30 Apr 2015, at 18:12, Rohit Yadav notifications@github.com wrote:

@Runseb - Sure. I was testing 4.5 today and the awsapi service did not work for me, after wasting almost 2 hours to make it work, I tried ec2stack which worked out of the box. I thought it would be a good idea to get rid of it and promote ec2stack :)

I’ve split the changes in 3 commits to make it easier to rebase/merge. I’ll keep this open and hope to merge it next week but am interested in merge it now to avoid rebasing efforts again. If ec2stack will get its own git repo like docs repos or cloudmonkey - does it matter if we merge this now or next week and will this block 4.6 release management?

Nothing technical, just a better process in my view. To be sure we dont have a period with no official ec2 interface.

Lets talk it over a bit and decide mud next week . That should not causr too much rebase headache.

Ok ?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member Author

Copy that.

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member Author

@Runseb is this good to go now that ec2stack is an apache cloudstack sub-project? I'll rebase and do some tests again if it's okay merge this PR.

@sebgoa
Copy link
Member

sebgoa commented May 6, 2015

let's go for it, there has been enough warning. So if you can rebase, make Travis happy….and squash everything that would be good.

@sebgoa
Copy link
Member

sebgoa commented May 6, 2015

Maybe do it after Daan merges 4.5.1….?

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member Author

merging 4.5.1 looks like will cause a lot of conflicts; I'm merging it after rebasing and pushing to master and if travis and packaging works

Following actions from discussions on dev ML regarding removing awsapi and
prefering ec2stack. Reference from last PR:
#44

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
- Removes awsapi packaging rules for debian, centos63, centos7, fedora 20/21
- Removes catalina port 7080 service configs
- Fixes build replace properties for AWSAPILOG
- Removes maven profile for building awsapi and deploying db in developer profile

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
- Removes awsapi db properties usage across codebase
- Removes references from spring xmls, test cases and TransactionLegacy
- Adds sql command to drop database cloudbridge in schema-451to460-cleanup.sql

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented May 6, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #115 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented May 6, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #114 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

It may be useful for users to get some data, so avoid dropping cloudbridge db

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member Author

All green, merging now.

@asfgit asfgit merged commit 0af9c65 into master May 6, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2015
This closes #216

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
@asfgit asfgit deleted the nuke-awsapi branch May 6, 2015 15:15
@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented May 6, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #116 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

shwstppr pushed a commit to shapeblue/cloudstack that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
* Support RFB 3.8 and VNC auth working

* IN PROGRESS: Add TigerVNC classes and authenticate, work left on the messaging

* Fix console display

* Cleanup

* Last in-progress work

* Don't block reads in case stream empty, use Link to init client certs (apache#215)

Co-authored-by: Marcus Sorensen <mls@apple.com>

* Unused files and methods cleanup

* Rewrite finished

* More cleanup

* Rename console server session to VM display name (apache#216)

* Rename console server session to VM display name

* Fix after rebasing

* Add encryption bar when available

Co-authored-by: Marcus Sorensen <mls@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Vazquez <nicovazquez90@gmail.com>

* Add missing license header

* Remove unused variable from the TLS security

* Address review comments and sonar cloud reports

* Address more review comments

* Last sonarcloud code smell fixes

* Automate VNC TLS provisioning and improve UI

* Add missing cases for sonarcloud report

* Fix certs renewal issue on configuring TLS

* Address review comments

* Refactor serviceConfig script

* Fix certs propagation TLS conf

* Fix unsecure host tests

Co-authored-by: Marcus Sorensen <marcus_sorensen@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcus Sorensen <mls@apple.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants