⚡ Optimize docs-tree API with asynchronous I/O and parallel processing #249
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
💡 What: Refactored
app/api/docs-tree/route.tsto use asynchronous file system operations (fs.promises.readdir,fs.promises.access) instead of synchronous ones. Additionally, optimized the directory tree traversal and candidate selection to run in parallel usingPromise.all.🎯 Why: Synchronous I/O operations block the Node.js event loop, which can lead to poor scalability and unresponsiveness under load. Moving to asynchronous I/O allows the server to handle other requests while waiting for file system operations to complete.
📊 Measured Improvement:
In a micro-benchmark traversing 35 directories at depth 2:
While raw latency in a single-threaded micro-benchmark is slightly higher than Sync due to promise overhead, the primary benefit is non-blocking execution, ensuring the server remains responsive. The parallel optimization significantly mitigates the async overhead.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 13909542395769991391 started by @longsizhuo