Evidence + decision / local-first

The work is autonomous. The decision is still yours.

Decisions outlive conversations. Pointbreak preserves the evidence behind software decisions.

  • model-agnostic
  • work-centered
  • human authority
Reproducible Review example POINTBREAK PACK / CHECKOUT-REFACTOR
decision record / checkout-refactor Inspect the reproducible example ↗
assessment current

Accepted

Accepted after the null-user invariant was defined, implemented, and independently verified.

writer
actor:agent:pointbreak-example-reviewer
track
example:marketing-review-proof
state
current
revision
rev:sha256:fa6981d38de12a850da707b69657e7a9153120c92a0dd08f534fbb40394d885f
references
assess:sha256:131e0f06e28c0c1f688e2da745bf1539dfe0f943fdd64a066b7dc550543aca77 · replaces:assess:sha256:12c1b3c464be63580a18370e73dc140e6fbeaad40347e0afc2f9f6788a83ca76
10 projected events 13 source events

Not a transcript. A record of what mattered.

Current product Pointbreak Review keeps the review record attached to the work.

The why

Show me the evidence behind this change.

The bottleneck moved

Your agents already make claims.

The hard part is no longer producing patches or explanations. It is deciding what deserves trust when the work outpaces anyone's ability to watch it happen.

A claim is a starting point. Not a verdict.

  1. 01 Author claim
    “This refactor preserves checkout behavior.”
    Coding agent Context, not proof
  2. 02 Validation claim
    “The test suite passes on the captured revision.”
    Coding agent Result claimed
  3. 03 Readiness claim
    “The remaining edge case can ship as follow-up.”
    Coding agent Decision still open
TRANSCRIPT

what was said / when it was said / buried in a session

POINTBREAK

what mattered / who wrote it / the exact work it describes

The layer, made concrete

The record behind
the decision.

Pointbreak Review keeps the claims, evidence, open questions, responses, and assessments anchored to the exact change.

Pointbreak Review available now

Evidence stays with the work

Keep the proof. Not the play-by-play.

Capture what another person needs to inspect without turning a chat transcript into the system of record. Every entry stays attributed and attached to the work it describes.

  • work Exact revision or captured state
  • actors Attributed, signable events
  • state Visible replacement and uncertainty
Actual Pointbreak Review interface Product source 7131fc1 ↗
Same reproducible Review example · actual product pixels · unsigned events Not a hosted demo · Inspect the reproducible example · captured from Pointbreak 7131fc1.

The work loop

From output to accountable decision.

Pointbreak does not decide for you. It makes the basis of the decision inspectable.

Read the principles
  1. 01 Work

    Capture the state.

    Anchor the record to the exact revision or working state under review.

    revision · captured state
  2. 02 Claims

    Name what is asserted.

    Keep the author’s facts and reasoning as attributed context—not unquestioned truth.

    observation · actor
  3. 03 Evidence

    Test what can be tested.

    Attach validation and exact runtime facts another actor can inspect.

    validation · runtime fact
  4. 04 Questions

    Surface what remains.

    Keep requests, disagreement, and uncertainty open until someone accountable responds.

    input request · response
  5. 05 Call

    Make the call durable.

    Record the assessment, the exact state it covers, and any work that must follow.

    assessment · follow-up
THE DURABLE OBJECT

The work behind the decision.

NOT THE CHAT. NOT THE MODEL. NOT THE SESSION.

The next decision starts here

Inspect the evidence.
Make the call.

Pointbreak Review keeps the evidence behind each review call in one durable record attached to the change.

  • open-source review
  • local-first records
  • model-agnostic