Abstract
The re-examination of the existing economic and environmental policies in the South and Southeast Asian countries seems to be necessary, as these countries are struggling to achieve the goals of sustainable development. For designing a long-term environmental policy, we intended to examine whether the selected economic and demographic indicators have influenced the ecological footprint in the eight developing countries of Asia from 1990 to 2015. The use of pooled mean group (PMG) approach allowed driving the long-run common coefficients, which may facilitate us to develop a common policy framework for fortifying the environmental quality. The computed results confirmed that the selected variables are cointegrated in the long run, and the variables, i.e., per capita income, nonrenewable energy usage, urbanization, fertility rate, and population density are observed as the significant drivers of the environmental pollution. Moreover, the consumption of renewable energy restored the environmental quality in these countries. Based on the results, we recommended the need for the diversification of the energy-basket for enhancement of the use of renewable energy resources. Further, through sensitization of the necessity of environmental conservation, the governments should promote less carbon-intense economic and demographic practices across the industries and sectors.



Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Details available at http://ap.fftc.org.tw/ap_db.php?id=281
References
Acharyya J (2009) FDI, growth and the environment: evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. J Econ Dev 34(1):43–58
Al-mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., Mohammed, A., 2015. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological indicators, 48, 315-323
Alola A (2019) The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: accounting for environmental sustainability. Sci Total Environ 658:260–267
Alola AA, Arikewuyo AO, Ozad B, Alola UV, Arikewuyo HO (2019a) A drain or drench on biocapacity? Environmental account of fertility, marriage, and ICT in the USA and Canada. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:4032–4043
Alola A, Bekum F, Sarkodie S (2019b) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709
Baltagi B, Bratberg E, Holmas T (2005) A panel data study of physicians’ labor supply: the case of Norway. Health Econ 14(10):1035–1045
Birdsall N (1992) Another look at population and global warming. In: Policy research working paper series 1020, the World Bank, population, health, and nutrition. D.C, Washington
Cafaro P (2012) Climate ethics and population policy. Climate Change 3(1):45–61
Charfeddine L (2017) The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Econ 65:355–374
Chudik AM, Pesaran H (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econ 188(2):393–420
Danish B, Wang ZW (2017) Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: evidence from Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90(1):27–50
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537
Dietz T, Rosa E, York (2007) Driving the human ecological footprint. Front Ecol Environ 5(1):13–18
Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu K (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment 30(6):1065–1086
Dong K, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 94:419–429
Downey L, Hawkins B (2008) Single-mother families and air pollution: a national study. Soc Sci Q 89(2):523–536
Feng, Z., Wu, J., 2011. Relationship between the ecological footprint and the economic growth in China. 2011 international conference on remote sensing, environment and transportation engineering, IEEE, Nanjing, China (pp. 6205-6211)
Friedl B, Getzner M (2003) Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 45(1):133–148
Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian M, Wagner N, Gorini R (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews 24:38–50
Godfray H, Garnetl T (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Philos Trans R Soc B 369(1639):1–10
Greenpeace Southeast Asia., 2019. Latest air pollution data ranks world’s cities worst to best. https://www.greenpeace.org/southeastasia/press/679/latest-air-pollution-data-ranks-worlds-cities-worst-to-best/
Hasnat, G., Kabir, M., Hossain, M., 2018. Major environmental issues and problems of South Asia, particularly Bangladesh. In: Hussain, C. (Ed.) handbook of environmental materials management, Switzerland AG: springer, Cham, (pp. 1-40)
Holtz-Eakin D, Selden T (1995) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. J Public Econ 57(1):85–101
Hubacek K, Guan D, Barrett J, Wiedmann T (2009) Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprints. J Clean Prod 17(14):1241–1248
Isaksen E, Narbel P (2017) A carbon footprint proportional to expenditure-a case for Norway? Ecol Econ 131:152–165
Karasoy A, Akçay S (2019) Effects of renewable energy consumption and trade on environmental pollution. Manag Environ Qual 30(2):437–455
Khanal R, Shrestha S (2005) Development of procedures and the assessment of EDB of local levels due to major environmental risk factors. Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu
Khwaja M, Umer F, Shaheen N, Sherazi A, Shaheen F (2012) Air pollution reduction and control in South Asia. In: Working paper series 121. Pakistan, Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad
Kolcava D, Nguyen Q, Bernauer T (2019) Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy? Ecol Econ 163:98–112
Liang, L., Wang, Z., Li, J., 2019. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of cleaner production 237 (10 November 2019), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619324990
Liu J, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Luck G (2003) Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421:530–533
MacKinnon J (2002) Status of biodiversity in Asia—ICEM. In: Carew-Reid J (ed) Biodiversity planning in Asia. IUCN. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp 49–72
Marquart-Pyatt S (2015) Environmental sustainability: the ecological footprint in West Africa. Hum Ecol Rev 22(1):73–92
Nasir M, Huynh T, Tram H (2019) Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: a case of emerging ASEAN. J Environ Manag 242:131–141
Nazir M, Mahdi A, Bilal M, Sohail H, Ali N, Iqbal H (2019) Environmental impact and pollution-related challenges of renewable wind energy paradigm – a review. Sci Total Environ 683:436–444
Newman P (2006) The environmental impact of cities. Environ Urban 18(2):275–295
Nguyen D, Sévi B, Sjö B, Uddin G (2017) The role of trade openness and investment in examining the energy-growth-pollution nexus: empirical evidence for China and India. Appl Econ 49(40):4083–4098
OECD (2018) Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018: fostering growth through digitalisation. OECD Publishing, Paris http://dx.doi.org/9789264286184-en
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(s1):653–670
Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith R (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of American Statistic Association 94(446):621–634
Piaggio M, Padilla E, Román C (2017) The long-term relationship between CO2 emissions and economic activity in a small open economy: Uruguay 1882–2010. Energy Econ 65:271–282
PTI., 2018. CO2 emissions cost India USD 210 billion every year: study. The Economics Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/co2-emissions-cost-india-usd-210-billion-every-year-study/articleshow/65961331.cms?from=mdr
PTI., 2019. India's pollution control policies unlikely to improve air quality: study. The Economic Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/indias-pollution-control-policies-unlikely-to-improve-air-quality-study/articleshow/68654604.cms?from=mdr
Remuzgo L, Sarabia J (2015) International inequality in CO2 emissions: a new factorial decomposition based on Kaya factors. Environ Sci Pol 54:15–24
Ritchie, H., Roser, M., 2019. Urbanization, https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization#note-4
Rodríguez M, Pena-Boquete Y (2017) Carbon intensity changes in the Asian dragons. Lessons for climate policy design. Energy Econ 66:17–26
Sahoo, P., 2006. Foreign direct investment in South Asia: policy, trends, impact and determinants. ADB Institute discussion paper no. 56, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines
Selden T, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162
Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. J Econ Stud 46(1):106–168
Sharma R, Kautish P, Kumar D (2018) Assessing dynamism of crude oil demand in middle-income countries of South Asia: a panel data investigation. Glob Bus Rev:1–15 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0972150918795367
Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Uddin, M., 2019. Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Management of Environmental Quality, 1-28, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2019-0099
Squires D (2013) Biodiversity conservation in Asia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 1(1):144–159
The Economic Times., 2019. Out of top 10 most polluted cities in the world, 7 cities are from India alone. The Economic Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/out-of-top-10-most-polluted-cities-in-the-world-7-cities-are-from-india-alone/south-asias-battle/slideshow/68266564.cms
Tjoek P, Wu P (2018) Exploring the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 and SO2 for Southeast Asia in the 21st century context. Environmental Economics 9(1):7–21
Uddin G, Salahuddin M, Alam A, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Indic 77:166–175
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157
UNDP., 2019. Sustainable development goals. United Nations Development Programme: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2020. Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2020. Available at: https://www.unescap.org/publications/asia-and-pacific-sdg-progress-report-2020
Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publisher, Gabriola Island, BC
World Bank., 2015. Malaysia among most urbanized countries in East Asia, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/01/26/malaysia-among-most-urbanized-countries-in-east-asia
World Bank., 2019. World Development Indicators, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
Yorifuji T (2015) Health impact assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 in 27 Southeast and East Asian cities. J Occup Environ Med 57(7):751–756
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 357 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, R., Sinha, A. & Kautish, P. Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 36970–36982 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09659-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09659-3

